Hello,
I am the maintainer of both kubebox and kubebox-bin. It has been brought to my attention that kubebox, since it is not built from source, would be more appropriately named "kubebox-bin". I've already uploaded the new package and am requesting a merge for comments and votes.
Thank you, David Rodriguez
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 12:47:22PM -0500, David Rodriguez via aur-general wrote:
Hello,
I am the maintainer of both kubebox and kubebox-bin. It has been brought to my attention that kubebox, since it is not built from source, would be more appropriately named "kubebox-bin". I've already uploaded the new package and am requesting a merge for comments and votes.
Hello, David.
I can't seem to find your request on the requests system. Did you manage to submit it already? Once you do, you can let me know and I'll take a look.
Thanks, -Santiago
On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 12:47:22 -0500 David Rodriguez via aur-general aur-general@archlinux.org wrote:
Hello,
I am the maintainer of both kubebox and kubebox-bin. It has been brought to my attention that kubebox, since it is not built from source, would be more appropriately named "kubebox-bin". I've already uploaded the new package and am requesting a merge for comments and votes.
Thank you, David Rodriguez
There is a link on the right side of the AUR package page for package requests. This is how you request merging.
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org