2010/1/7 Ionut Biru :

can you elaborate more on what kind of problems do you have with aufs?

Behavior is pretty random. Sometimes I'll just get the "wrong mount option" error when running makechrootpkg, sometimes module loading will hang, sometimes it'll print a stack trace and die, and even though the module appears to be loaded it doesn't work and cannot be removed. I think I remember somebody talking about similar problems on an arch list but I can't find it right now. This happens on my main machine (x86_64 on [testing]) and on my virtual building machine (i686 on 2.6.31, I don't care to update it since I use chroots in there too). It works on another x86_64 build machine, though, which still has 2.6.30.

i'll do those rebuilds now.

Thanks a lot.

I also need a rebuild on acerhk. It is an i686-only kernel module, a simple pkgrel bump should be more than enough. By the way, I don't even use the driver anymore, rebuilding is not much of a hassle, but if any TU uses it, feel free to take it.

Hi Corrado, I rebuilt acerhk for you, and I will upload it. However I saw the following error, and I'm not quite sure what it means: Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 1 modules WARNING: modpost: Found 2 section mismatch(es). To see full details build your kernel with: 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y' Do you have any idea? Nevertheless, the package built successfully. Sorry, I can't test, because I don't use the driver. -- Chris

* Ray Rashif [09.01.2010 20:38]:

2010/1/10 Chris Brannon :

...

...

I also need a rebuild on acerhk. It is an i686-only kernel module, a simple pkgrel bump should be more than enough. By the way, I don't even use the driver anymore, rebuilding is not much of a hassle, but if any TU uses it, feel free to take it.

Hi Corrado, I rebuilt acerhk for you, and I will upload it.  However I saw the following error, and I'm not quite sure what it means:

 Building modules, stage 2.  MODPOST 1 modules WARNING: modpost: Found 2 section mismatch(es). To see full details build your kernel with: 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y'

Do you have any idea?  Nevertheless, the package built successfully. Sorry, I can't test, because I don't use the driver.

According to http://bkhome.org/blog/?viewDetailed=00965 that's not really harmful :)

-- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD

I hope I'm not completely wrong with this, but the current version of acerhk is built for kernel 2.6.31, so of course it won't work ;-) I recompiled it for 2.6.32, but it didn't work at all. Actually, my multimedia keys stopped working after loadging the acerhk module. Are there any TUs with computers with hardware using the acerhk module? I can do testing, if required, although I don't really use this module. My laptop is a Medion MD94500. Greetz Army

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Chris Brannon wrote:

...

I hope I'm not completely wrong with this, but the current version of acerhk  is built for kernel 2.6.31, so of course it won't work ;-)

I updated it for 2.6.32 Saturday. If the new package from [community] still doesn't work for you, and no TU has the hardware or interest, then I can try to do some further investigation, updating the package accordingly.

-- Chris

You probably forgot to reboot into your new kernel. Judging from its content, the package was built for 2.6.31: * lib/modules/2.6.31-ARCH/kernel/drivers/ * lib/modules/2.6.31-ARCH/kernel/ * lib/modules/2.6.31-ARCH/ * lib/modules/ * lib/ * etc/rc.d/acerhk * etc/ * etc/rc.d/ * lib/modules/2.6.31-ARCH/kernel/drivers/block/ * lib/modules/2.6.31-ARCH/kernel/drivers/block/acerhk.ko Eric