[aur-general] Delete fmod?

newer
[aur-general] Delete kmod-mkiss...

Sven-Hendrik Haase

17 Jul 2010 17 Jul '10

8:59 p.m.

The fmod package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=103) currently does not have any Google-accessible package source and upstream support for it has long been stopped. Its newer version, fmodex, is in community (yes, we do have permission to redistribute it). It thus doesn't build anymore. Should such a package be deleted or should it be left there? -- Sven-Hendrik

Show replies by date

Ray Rashif

17 Jul 17 Jul

9:26 p.m.

On 18/07/2010, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:

...

The fmod package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=103) currently does not have any Google-accessible package source and upstream support for it has long been stopped. Its newer version, fmodex, is in community (yes, we do have permission to redistribute it). It thus doesn't build anymore. Should such a package be deleted or should it be left there?

Delete it. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD

Ionuț Bîru

9:29 p.m.

On 07/18/2010 12:26 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:

...

On 18/07/2010, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:

...
The fmod package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=103) currently does not have any Google-accessible package source and upstream support for it has long been stopped. Its newer version, fmodex, is in community (yes, we do have permission to redistribute it). It thus doesn't build anymore. Should such a package be deleted or should it be left there?

Delete it.

+1 -- Ionuț

Jan Steffens

18 Jul 18 Jul

12:08 a.m.

+2 On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:

...

On 07/18/2010 12:26 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:

...
On 18/07/2010, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:

...
The fmod package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=103) currently does not have any Google-accessible package source and upstream support for it has long been stopped. Its newer version, fmodex, is in community (yes, we do have permission to redistribute it). It thus doesn't build anymore. Should such a package be deleted or should it be left there?

Delete it.

+1

-- Ionuț

Thomas Dziedzic

12:18 a.m.

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:

...

+2

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:

...
On 07/18/2010 12:26 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:

...
On 18/07/2010, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:

...
The fmod package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=103) currently does not have any Google-accessible package source and upstream support for it has long been stopped. Its newer version, fmodex, is in community (yes, we do have permission to redistribute it). It thus doesn't build anymore. Should such a package be deleted or should it be left there?

Delete it.

+1

-- Ionuț

Sven-Hendrik Haase

12:37 a.m.

On 18.07.2010 02:18, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:

...

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Jan Steffens wrote:

...
+2

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:

...
On 07/18/2010 12:26 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:

...
On 18/07/2010, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:

...
The fmod package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=103) currently does not have any Google-accessible package source and upstream support for it has long been stopped. Its newer version, fmodex, is in community (yes, we do have permission to redistribute it). It thus doesn't build anymore. Should such a package be deleted or should it be left there? Delete it.

+1

-- Ionuț

+1

Deleted.

5034

Age (days ago)

5035

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

5 comments

5 participants

participants (5)

Ionuț Bîru
Jan Steffens
Ray Rashif
Sven-Hendrik Haase
Thomas Dziedzic