Hi all,
this is a motion for "Special Removal of an Inactive TU" [1] for Andrzej Giniewicz (giniu) based on prolonged inactivity.
After the removal of Andrzej's packager key due to Bartłomiej Piotrowski's main key removal [2] it has been the consensus for him to create a new packager key. However, this never happened and meanwhile Andrzej's last TU vote is 131 (we're at 136) and he has last logged in to the AUR on 2022-02-14.
In January I reached out publicly [3] to ask for progress on the matter, but got no reply. Privately I have again attempted to reach out on 2022-04-08, stating that after two weeks of no reply this here process would be started. This time has now passed.
The discussion period will last for three days, after that I will open the vote, which will last for five days.
Best, David
[1] https://tu-bylaws.aur.archlinux.org/#_special_removal_of_an_inactive_tu [2] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2021-May/030445.html [3] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2022-January/030643.ht...
On 2022-04-25 12:20:47 (+0200), David Runge via aur-general wrote:
The discussion period will last for three days, after that I will open the vote, which will last for five days.
The vote has now started: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/137
Best, David
On 2022-04-28 12:47:07 (+0200), David Runge via aur-general wrote:
On 2022-04-25 12:20:47 (+0200), David Runge via aur-general wrote:
The discussion period will last for three days, after that I will open the vote, which will last for five days.
The vote has now started: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/137
The results are in:
Yes No Abstain Total Participation 44 1 8 53 85.48%
This means giniu is now no longer a Trusted User.
I hereby would like to extend my gratitude towards Andrzej for the packaging work he has done in the past.
All the best for the future, David
On 2022-05-05 16:09:00 (+0200), David Runge via aur-general wrote:
The results are in:
Yes No Abstain Total Participation 44 1 8 53 85.48%
This means giniu is now no longer a Trusted User.
I hereby would like to extend my gratitude towards Andrzej for the packaging work he has done in the past.
I have just been made aware of the fact, that my signature for the above mail is broken. That's due to the fact, that I added the signing capability to the subkey `E708C8F1B551DFD6` of my new PGP key `1793DAD5D803A8FFD7451697BB992F9864FAD168` for testing purposes (nitrokey + openssh != fun). However, the subkey will not have the signing capability going forward. It was nevertheless chosen by gnupg, because of the "intuitive feature" of just selecting the first subkey with signing capabilities, *even if* one choses to sign with the main public key (a trailing "!" needs to be added to enforce the use of a key...).
Hence here is another attempt at hopefully signing with the correct key :)
Best, David
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org