On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM, xandry <avm-xandry@yandex.ru> wrote:

Good. But what sense in it if nvidia-utils-beta gives the same functional (besides for two architectures)?

Stefan Husmann <stefan-husmann@t-online.de> писал(а) в своём письме Tue, 29 Jun 2010 02:38:18 +0600:

...

Am 28.06.2010 21:37, schrieb xandry:

...

Hi. Please delete packages:

lib32-nvidia-utils-173.14.18-1 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24998) lib32-nvidia-utils-173.14.20-1 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29042) It's out of date, orphans, not support by upstream and are substituted lib32-nvidia-utils-173xx (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29043)

lib32-nvidia-utils-180.29-3 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24710) Out of date, not support by upstream and it is substituted extra/nvidia-utils

lib32-nvidia-utils-beta (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19453) nvidia-utils-all-beta (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37902) Are substituted nvidia-utils-beta (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19224)

removed all except lib32-nvidia-utils-beta (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19453), which seems to be actively maintained.

I believe it's because lib32-nvidia-utils-beta provides 32bit files for 64bit architecture.