[aur-general] Orphan and merge request
Hello I want following package be orphaned: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth/ and merged with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth-git/ I tried to get in contact with the maintainer via comment (see 2012-11-22 13:21) and via E-Mail (Done that 16.01.2013) So I waited extra long ;) Why should those packages be merged? Both provide a -git package and there is no stable version (>2.0) to be found And the gimp-resynth PKGBuild is quite error prone, with those sed commands, that aren't necessary Greetings
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Lex Black <autumn-wind@web.de> wrote:
Hello
I want following package be orphaned: https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/gimp-resynth/<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth/>
and merged with
I tried to get in contact with the maintainer via comment (see 2012-11-22 13:21) and via E-Mail (Done that 16.01.2013) So I waited extra long ;)
Why should those packages be merged? Both provide a -git package and there is no stable version (>2.0) to be found And the gimp-resynth PKGBuild is quite error prone, with those sed commands, that aren't necessary
Dear TU's, I didn't see any answer on this and both packages are intact. Is there a pressing reason for not doing this merge? Thanks for your hard work on the AUR.
On 02/04/2013 06:37 PM, SanskritFritz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Lex Black <autumn-wind@web.de> wrote:
Hello
I want following package be orphaned: https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/gimp-resynth/<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth/>
and merged with
I tried to get in contact with the maintainer via comment (see 2012-11-22 13:21) and via E-Mail (Done that 16.01.2013) So I waited extra long ;)
Why should those packages be merged? Both provide a -git package and there is no stable version (>2.0) to be found And the gimp-resynth PKGBuild is quite error prone, with those sed commands, that aren't necessary
Dear TU's, I didn't see any answer on this and both packages are intact. Is there a pressing reason for not doing this merge? Thanks for your hard work on the AUR.
Merged, thanks. -- Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Felix Yan <felixonmars@gmail.com> wrote:
Merged, thanks.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Ike Devolder <ike.devolder@gmail.com> wrote:
merged, thx
You guys rock, thanks! So, I guess the votes doubled now as there were two merges :p
Op maandag 4 februari 2013 11:49:17 schreef SanskritFritz:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Felix Yan <felixonmars@gmail.com> wrote:
Merged, thanks.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Ike Devolder <ike.devolder@gmail.com> wrote:
merged, thx
You guys rock, thanks! So, I guess the votes doubled now as there were two merges :p
that would have been a nice bug, but it did not happen :p -- Ike
Op maandag 4 februari 2013 11:37:59 schreef SanskritFritz:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Lex Black <autumn-wind@web.de> wrote:
Hello
I want following package be orphaned: https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/gimp-resynth/<https://aur.archl inux.org/packages/gimp-resynth/>
and merged with
https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/gimp-resynth-git/<https://aur.a rchlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth-git/>
I tried to get in contact with the maintainer via comment (see 2012-11-22 13:21) and via E-Mail (Done that 16.01.2013) So I waited extra long ;)
Why should those packages be merged? Both provide a -git package and there is no stable version (>2.0) to be found And the gimp-resynth PKGBuild is quite error prone, with those sed commands, that aren't necessary
Dear TU's, I didn't see any answer on this and both packages are intact. Is there a pressing reason for not doing this merge? Thanks for your hard work on the AUR.
merged, thx -- Ike
participants (4)
-
Felix Yan
-
Ike Devolder
-
Lex Black
-
SanskritFritz