[aur-general] Merge request: mpv-player-git -> mpv-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-player-git/ into: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-git/ They build the same project, except the former does it an insane way. J. Leclanche
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Jerome Leclanche <adys.wh@gmail.com> wrote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-player-git/ into: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-git/
They build the same project, except the former does it an insane way.
J. Leclanche
Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Could you please explain 'insane' in this context? It is bleeding edge - but so what! On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Jerome Leclanche <adys.wh@gmail.com> wrote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-player-git/ into: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-git/
They build the same project, except the former does it an insane way.
J. Leclanche
Merged, thx.
-- Maxime
If the user wants bleeding edge for the libs, they can replace their packages by -git packages; as long as they provide the base package the dependency will match. J. Leclanche On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Rob Til Freedmen <rob.til.freedman@gmail.com> wrote:
Could you please explain 'insane' in this context?
It is bleeding edge - but so what!
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Jerome Leclanche <adys.wh@gmail.com> wrote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-player-git/ into: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-git/
They build the same project, except the former does it an insane way.
J. Leclanche
Merged, thx.
-- Maxime
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Jerome Leclanche <adys.wh@gmail.com> wrote:
If the user wants bleeding edge for the libs, they can replace their packages by -git packages; as long as they provide the base package the dependency will match. J. Leclanche
Your recommendation would break a lot of other packages My build uses static libs - so it doesn't break anything
la, 2013-09-07 kello 14:15 +0200, Rob Til Freedmen kirjoitti
Your recommendation would break a lot of other packages My build uses static libs - so it doesn't break anything
I don't really think so. Atleast libav-git works well and doesn't break a single package I have in my systems and I don't think ffmpeg-git does eather. Same goes for the other git stuff too. I ofcourse cannot say for 100% if the packages, but none of the ones I have installed do not mind having -git version of those libs. And I do have fairly recentish builds of them.
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara <jesse.jaara@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't really think so. Atleast libav-git works well and doesn't break a single package I have in my systems and I don't think ffmpeg-git does eather. Same goes for the other git stuff too.
Any references on why and how this is even possible to do? It is neither safe nor sane. cheers! mar77i
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Martti Kühne <mysatyre@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara <jesse.jaara@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't really think so. Atleast libav-git works well and doesn't break a single package I have in my systems and I don't think ffmpeg-git does eather. Same goes for the other git stuff too.
Any references on why and how this is even possible to do? It is neither safe nor sane.
cheers! mar77i
Why: Because some people want/need git packages and don't want to install it in /usr/local or want it managed by pacman. How: Just install the -git library. If the PKGBUILD is correctly written, it will conflict with the regular package and act as it provides it. JL
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Jerome Leclanche <adys.wh@gmail.com> wrote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-player-git/ into: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-git/
They build the same project, except the former does it an insane way.
J. Leclanche
What you call 'insane' is recommended by the developers - just take your time and read git://github.com/mpv-player/mpv-build.git On the other hand - I call it insane (irritating, useless & utterly nonsense) to use configure options intended to be used for OSX or WIndows systems in a Arch PKGBUILD, eg. --disable-direct3d --disable-corevideo --disable-cocoa --disable-coreaudio as if they were valid but unwanted options in the build. I wonder why you didn't add '--disable-dsound' in your build.
On 2013-09-09 17:38, Rob Til Freedmen wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Jerome Leclanche <adys.wh@gmail.com> wrote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-player-git/ into: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-git/
They build the same project, except the former does it an insane way.
J. Leclanche
What you call 'insane' is recommended by the developers - just take your time and read git://github.com/mpv-player/mpv-build.git
On the other hand - I call it insane (irritating, useless & utterly nonsense) to use configure options intended to be used for OSX or WIndows systems in a Arch PKGBUILD, eg. --disable-direct3d --disable-corevideo --disable-cocoa --disable-coreaudio as if they were valid but unwanted options in the build.
I wonder why you didn't add '--disable-dsound' in your build.
I wonder why do you waste time here instead of doing something useful for AUR or Arch community. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski <b@bpiotrowski.pl>wrote:
On 2013-09-09 17:38, Rob Til Freedmen wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Jerome Leclanche <adys.wh@gmail.com> wrote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-player-git/ into: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-git/
They build the same project, except the former does it an insane way.
J. Leclanche
What you call 'insane' is recommended by the developers - just take your time and read git://github.com/mpv-player/mpv-build.git
On the other hand - I call it insane (irritating, useless & utterly nonsense) to use configure options intended to be used for OSX or WIndows systems in a Arch PKGBUILD, eg. --disable-direct3d --disable-corevideo --disable-cocoa --disable-coreaudio as if they were valid but unwanted options in the build.
I wonder why you didn't add '--disable-dsound' in your build.
I wonder why do you waste time here instead of doing something useful for AUR or Arch community.
Something like discussing on the AUR mailing list every once in a while - posting a sentence or two? Is it waste of time discussing, really? took me 69s --
Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/
SCNR: but I want my bikeshed in filibuster blue...
participants (6)
-
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
-
Jerome Leclanche
-
Jesse Juhani Jaara
-
Martti Kühne
-
Maxime Gauduin
-
Rob Til Freedmen