[aur-general] aur.archlinux.org down?
$ ping aur.archlinux.org PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data.
From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded ^C --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 1001ms
$ wget aur.archlinux.org --2010-12-22 22:02:14-- http://aur.archlinux.org/ Resolving aur.archlinux.org... 208.92.232.29 Connecting to aur.archlinux.org|208.92.232.29|:80... failed: No route to host. Regards, -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
Yeah. Can't update my package until they get it back up and running again. On 12/22/10, Seblu <seblu@seblu.net> wrote:
$ ping aur.archlinux.org PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded ^C --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 1001ms
$ wget aur.archlinux.org --2010-12-22 22:02:14-- http://aur.archlinux.org/ Resolving aur.archlinux.org... 208.92.232.29 Connecting to aur.archlinux.org|208.92.232.29|:80... failed: No route to host.
Regards, -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
Not that anybody's gonna download it in the meantime ^^. On 12/22/10, Det <nimetonmaili@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah. Can't update my package until they get it back up and running again.
On 12/22/10, Seblu <seblu@seblu.net> wrote:
$ ping aur.archlinux.org PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded ^C --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 1001ms
$ wget aur.archlinux.org --2010-12-22 22:02:14-- http://aur.archlinux.org/ Resolving aur.archlinux.org... 208.92.232.29 Connecting to aur.archlinux.org|208.92.232.29|:80... failed: No route to host.
Regards, -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
On 12/22/2010 11:03 PM, Seblu wrote:
$ ping aur.archlinux.org PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded ^C --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 1001ms
$ wget aur.archlinux.org --2010-12-22 22:02:14-- http://aur.archlinux.org/ Resolving aur.archlinux.org... 208.92.232.29 Connecting to aur.archlinux.org|208.92.232.29|:80... failed: No route to host.
Regards,
PANIC is not our problem. seems that provider has some networking issues. even their website is down. sevenl.net -- Ionuț
Ionuț Bîru wrote:
PANIC
is not our problem. seems that provider has some networking issues. even their website is down.
sevenl.net
-- Ionuț
Wtf did Allan do this time?
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Ionuț Bîru <ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 12/22/2010 11:03 PM, Seblu wrote:
$ ping aur.archlinux.org PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded ^C --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 1001ms
$ wget aur.archlinux.org --2010-12-22 22:02:14-- http://aur.archlinux.org/ Resolving aur.archlinux.org... 208.92.232.29 Connecting to aur.archlinux.org|208.92.232.29|:80... failed: No route to host.
Regards,
PANIC
is not our problem. seems that provider has some networking issues. even their website is down.
sevenl.net About that, there is a place (wiki?) where information on network/system infrastructure of archlinux?
-- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
On (12/24/10 15:57), Seblu wrote: -~> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Ionuț Bîru <ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote: -~> > On 12/22/2010 11:03 PM, Seblu wrote: -~> >> -~> >> $ ping aur.archlinux.org -~> >> PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. -~> >> From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded -~> >> From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded -~> >> ^C -~> >> --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- -~> >> 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time -~> >> 1001ms -~> >> -~> >> $ wget aur.archlinux.org -~> >> --2010-12-22 22:02:14-- http://aur.archlinux.org/ -~> >> Resolving aur.archlinux.org... 208.92.232.29 -~> >> Connecting to aur.archlinux.org|208.92.232.29|:80... failed: No route to -~> >> host. -~> >> -~> >> Regards, -~> > -~> > PANIC -~> > -~> > is not our problem. seems that provider has some networking issues. even -~> > their website is down. -~> > -~> > sevenl.net -~> About that, there is a place (wiki?) where information on -~> network/system infrastructure of archlinux? -~> -~> -- -~> Sébastien Luttringer -~> www.seblu.net https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Category:DeveloperWiki:Server_Configura...
Am 22.12.2010 22:03, schrieb Seblu:
$ ping aur.archlinux.org PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data.
From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded ^C --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 1001ms
$ wget aur.archlinux.org --2010-12-22 22:02:14-- http://aur.archlinux.org/ Resolving aur.archlinux.org... 208.92.232.29 Connecting to aur.archlinux.org|208.92.232.29|:80... failed: No route to host.
Regards,
Works fo me now.
participants (7)
-
Allan McRae
-
Det
-
Ionuț Bîru
-
Leonid Isaev
-
Seblu
-
Stefan Husmann
-
Xyne