[aur-general] Acroread packages.
Hi folks, Does anyone know of a reason why the bin32- acroread packages can't be deleted? The standard acroread packages support both arches now. (Just thought I'd check I wasn't missing anything before getting trigger happy...) Cheers, Pete.
On 30 November 2010 17:36, Peter Lewis <plewis@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
Hi folks,
Does anyone know of a reason why the bin32- acroread packages can't be deleted? The standard acroread packages support both arches now.
(Just thought I'd check I wasn't missing anything before getting trigger happy...) Which one have to be deleted?
-- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
On Tuesday 30 November 2010 16:38:42 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
On 30 November 2010 17:36, Peter Lewis <plewis@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
Does anyone know of a reason why the bin32- acroread packages can't be deleted? The standard acroread packages support both arches now.
(Just thought I'd check I wasn't missing anything before getting trigger happy...)
Which one have to be deleted?
Sorry, should have included some specifics: Well, bin32-acroread (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7906) appears to be superceded by acroread (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16980) and likewise with: bin32-acroread-ja / acroread-ja bin32-acroread-de / acroread-de The other language ones haven't been converted though (yet), except acroread- fi, for which there's just the one package. Pete.
On 30 November 2010 17:49, Peter Lewis <plewis@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
Well, bin32-acroread (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7906) appears to be superceded by acroread (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16980)
and likewise with:
bin32-acroread-ja / acroread-ja bin32-acroread-de / acroread-de deleted with no issues.
-- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
participants (2)
-
Andrea Scarpino
-
Peter Lewis