[aur-general] delete request
Hi, can somebody delete this packages... 1) obsolete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli) 2) duplicate http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard) Thanks
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher <paterbrown@silberhelme.de> wrote:
Hi, can somebody delete this packages...
1) obsolete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)
2) duplicate http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard)
Thanks
Done and done. Thank you. :-D Regards, Brad
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella <bradfanella@archlinux.us>wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher <paterbrown@silberhelme.de> wrote:
Hi, can somebody delete this packages...
1) obsolete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)
2) duplicate http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard)
Thanks
Done and done. Thank you. :-D
Regards, Brad
What was the name of these packages ? -- Cédric Girard
2011/1/10 Cédric Girard <girard.cedric@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella <bradfanella@archlinux.us
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher <paterbrown@silberhelme.de> wrote:
Hi, can somebody delete this packages...
1) obsolete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)
2) duplicate http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard)
Thanks
Done and done. Thank you. :-D
Regards, Brad
What was the name of these packages ?
-- Cédric Girard
Yes, brad just annihilated those packages in mere seconds, what were the names? -Tom Hatch
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch <thatch45@gmail.com> wrote:
2011/1/10 Cédric Girard <girard.cedric@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella <bradfanella@archlinux.us
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher <paterbrown@silberhelme.de> wrote:
Hi, can somebody delete this packages...
1) obsolete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)
2) duplicate http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard)
Thanks
Done and done. Thank you. :-D
Regards, Brad
What was the name of these packages ?
-- Cédric Girard
Yes, brad just annihilated those packages in mere seconds, what were the names?
-Tom Hatch
Um...uh... I don't quite remember to be quite honest. I did verify that they were obsolete/duplicates, however, so I suppose there's no harm done.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Brad Fanella <bradfanella@archlinux.us>wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch <thatch45@gmail.com> wrote:
2011/1/10 Cédric Girard <girard.cedric@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella < bradfanella@archlinux.us
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher <paterbrown@silberhelme.de> wrote:
Hi, can somebody delete this packages...
1) obsolete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)
2) duplicate http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard)
Thanks
Done and done. Thank you. :-D
Regards, Brad
What was the name of these packages ?
-- Cédric Girard
Yes, brad just annihilated those packages in mere seconds, what were the names?
-Tom Hatch
Um...uh...
I don't quite remember to be quite honest. I did verify that they were obsolete/duplicates, however, so I suppose there's no harm done.
Heh, I am not worried about harm, just curious! Congrats on being so fast on the draw!
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 17:01 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Brad Fanella <bradfanella@archlinux.us>wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch <thatch45@gmail.com> wrote:
2011/1/10 Cédric Girard <girard.cedric@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella < bradfanella@archlinux.us
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher <paterbrown@silberhelme.de> wrote:
Hi, can somebody delete this packages...
1) obsolete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)
2) duplicate http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard)
Thanks
Done and done. Thank you. :-D
Regards, Brad
What was the name of these packages ?
-- Cédric Girard
Yes, brad just annihilated those packages in mere seconds, what were the names?
-Tom Hatch
Um...uh...
I don't quite remember to be quite honest. I did verify that they were obsolete/duplicates, however, so I suppose there's no harm done.
Heh, I am not worried about harm, just curious! Congrats on being so fast on the draw!
On a related note: don't you guys sleep/work/do-something-else-other-than-read-aur-general-mails? =)
2011/1/10 Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@gmail.com>:
On a related note: don't you guys sleep/work/do-something-else-other-than-read-aur-general-mails? =)
Sleep? What is this "sleep" you speak of?
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 00:35:18 Brad Fanella wrote:
2011/1/10 Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@gmail.com>:
On a related note: don't you guys sleep/work/do-something-else-other-than-read-aur-general-mails? =)
Sleep? What is this "sleep" you speak of?
Where's Xyne when you need him? I think you mean "sleep of which you speak" ;-P
Peter Lewis wrote:
Sleep? What is this "sleep" you speak of?
Where's Xyne when you need him?
I think you mean "sleep of which you speak" ;-P
Meh, I disagree with the rule not to end sentences with a preposition. Sometimes it's just the most natural way to phrase it. Afaik, it only gained acceptance due to its use as a shibboleth. I wouldn't be surprised if it were dreamt up by the same Latin grammarians who decided that "to" is part of the verb's infinitive and thus should never be split from it. If I ever find their graves, I intend *to gladly spit* on them. The only "grammatical error" that annoys me is when people use "and I" when it should be "and me", and that's only because they are actively trying to speak "correctly" and yet failing miserably. "I went to the store." -> "My friend and I went to the store." "The owner threw me out." -> "The owner threw my friend and me out." "The owner threw I out." FAIL "The owner threw my friend and I out." Same thing. FAIL. Hypercorrectionism ftl. *heads off to get his Grammar Nazi promotion*
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Xyne <xyne@archlinux.ca> wrote:
Peter Lewis wrote:
Sleep? What is this "sleep" you speak of?
Where's Xyne when you need him?
I think you mean "sleep of which you speak" ;-P
Meh, I disagree with the rule not to end sentences with a preposition. Sometimes it's just the most natural way to phrase it. Afaik, it only gained acceptance due to its use as a shibboleth. I wouldn't be surprised if it were dreamt up by the same Latin grammarians who decided that "to" is part of the verb's infinitive and thus should never be split from it. If I ever find their graves, I intend *to gladly spit* on them.
The only "grammatical error" that annoys me is when people use "and I" when it should be "and me", and that's only because they are actively trying to speak "correctly" and yet failing miserably.
"I went to the store." -> "My friend and I went to the store." "The owner threw me out." -> "The owner threw my friend and me out."
"The owner threw I out." FAIL "The owner threw my friend and I out." Same thing. FAIL.
Hypercorrectionism ftl.
*heads off to get his Grammar Nazi promotion*
lol u mad bro
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Peter Lewis <plewis@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
Where's Xyne when you need him?
I think you mean "sleep of which you speak" ;-P
From the looks of it, a preposition can end a sentence if it is
Nope. Sorry. You're wrong. :-P Grammarians have come to the consensus that it is alright to end a sentence with a preposition, in cases such as "What did you step on?". preceded by a verb (at least from what I have observed).
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 21:02:31 Brad Fanella wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Peter Lewis <plewis@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
Where's Xyne when you need him?
I think you mean "sleep of which you speak" ;-P
Nope. Sorry. You're wrong. :-P
Grammarians have come to the consensus that it is alright to end a sentence with a preposition, in cases such as "What did you step on?". From the looks of it, a preposition can end a sentence if it is preceded by a verb (at least from what I have observed).
Meh, that is just something up with which I will not put! (But yes, you're right. But it is fun.)
2011/1/10 Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Brad Fanella <bradfanella@archlinux.us wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch <thatch45@gmail.com> wrote:
2011/1/10 Cédric Girard <girard.cedric@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella < bradfanella@archlinux.us
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher <paterbrown@silberhelme.de> wrote: > Hi, > can somebody delete this packages... > > 1) obsolete > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 > the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli) > > 2) duplicate > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 > the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard) > > Thanks >
Done and done. Thank you. :-D
Regards, Brad
What was the name of these packages ?
-- Cédric Girard
Yes, brad just annihilated those packages in mere seconds, what were
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 17:01 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: the
names?
-Tom Hatch
Um...uh...
I don't quite remember to be quite honest. I did verify that they were obsolete/duplicates, however, so I suppose there's no harm done.
Heh, I am not worried about harm, just curious! Congrats on being so fast on the draw!
On a related note: don't you guys sleep/work/do-something-else-other-than-read-aur-general-mails? =)
I knew my life was missing something :) No, my gmail is also my work email, so I am almost always close by :) -Tom Hatch
2011/1/11 Cédric Girard <girard.cedric@gmail.com>:
What was the name of these packages ?
Using my brand new time machine, I went back in time and noted their names; borderless-elementary-gtk-theme and nautilus-elementary-ur respectively.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis@gmail.com> wrote:
2011/1/11 Cédric Girard <girard.cedric@gmail.com>:
What was the name of these packages ?
Using my brand new time machine, I went back in time and noted their names; borderless-elementary-gtk-theme and nautilus-elementary-ur respectively.
That looks absolutely correct to me; but I'm sure my input doesn't matter, as I'm no match for your magical time machine.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Brad Fanella <bradfanella@archlinux.us>wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis@gmail.com> wrote:
2011/1/11 Cédric Girard <girard.cedric@gmail.com>:
What was the name of these packages ?
Using my brand new time machine, I went back in time and noted their names; borderless-elementary-gtk-theme and nautilus-elementary-ur respectively.
Awesome, any way I can take a look at your time machine, it is a delorean? A Tardis? :)
Really though.... what is this time machine?
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Thomas S Hatch <thatch45@gmail.com> wrote:
Really though.... what is this time machine?
I might have exaggerated a little bit about the time machine part. :3 ... Or maybe I do have a real time machine and I'm keeping its existence a secret (albeit not doing a great job at it). ... Nah, it was just cached pages of those links by Google. ... *Hops into the time machine to go back and warn his past self about mentioning the machine in public.*
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis@gmail.com>wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Thomas S Hatch <thatch45@gmail.com> wrote:
Really though.... what is this time machine?
I might have exaggerated a little bit about the time machine part. :3
...
Or maybe I do have a real time machine and I'm keeping its existence a secret (albeit not doing a great job at it).
...
Nah, it was just cached pages of those links by Google.
...
*Hops into the time machine to go back and warn his past self about mentioning the machine in public.*
pfft <witty> I should have thought of that! Thanks!
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis@gmail.com>wrote:
2011/1/11 Cédric Girard <girard.cedric@gmail.com>:
What was the name of these packages ?
Using my brand new time machine, I went back in time and noted their names; borderless-elementary-gtk-theme and nautilus-elementary-ur respectively.
Thank you. I indeed should have used the same time machine instead of spamming the ML. Sorry about that... Regards, -- Cédric Girard
participants (8)
-
Brad Fanella
-
Cédric Girard
-
Evangelos Foutras
-
Matthias Rascher
-
Ng Oon-Ee
-
Peter Lewis
-
Thomas S Hatch
-
Xyne