[aur-general] delete request

Matthias Rascher

10 Jan 2011 10 Jan '11

10:28 p.m.

Hi, can somebody delete this packages... 1) obsolete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli) 2) duplicate http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard) Thanks

Show replies by date

Brad Fanella

10 Jan 10 Jan

10:30 p.m.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher wrote:

...

Hi, can somebody delete this packages...

1) obsolete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)

2) duplicate http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard)

Thanks

Done and done. Thank you. :-D Regards, Brad

Cédric Girard

11:07 p.m.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella wrote:

...

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher wrote:

...
Hi, can somebody delete this packages...

1) obsolete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)

2) duplicate http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard)

Thanks

Done and done. Thank you. :-D

Regards, Brad

What was the name of these packages ? -- Cédric Girard

Thomas S Hatch

11:12 p.m.

2011/1/10 Cédric Girard

...

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella
...
wrote:

...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher wrote:

...
Hi, can somebody delete this packages...

1) obsolete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)

2) duplicate http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard)

Thanks

Done and done. Thank you. :-D

Regards, Brad

What was the name of these packages ?

-- Cédric Girard

Yes, brad just annihilated those packages in mere seconds, what were the names? -Tom Hatch

Brad Fanella

11:57 p.m.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:

...

2011/1/10 Cédric Girard

...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella
...
wrote:

...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher wrote:

...
Hi, can somebody delete this packages...

1) obsolete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)

2) duplicate http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard)

Thanks

Done and done. Thank you. :-D

Regards, Brad

What was the name of these packages ?

-- Cédric Girard

Yes, brad just annihilated those packages in mere seconds, what were the names?

-Tom Hatch

Um...uh... I don't quite remember to be quite honest. I did verify that they were obsolete/duplicates, however, so I suppose there's no harm done.

Thomas S Hatch

11 Jan 11 Jan

12:01 a.m.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Brad Fanella wrote:

...

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:

...
2011/1/10 Cédric Girard

...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella < bradfanella@archlinux.us

...
wrote:

...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher wrote:

...
Hi, can somebody delete this packages...

1) obsolete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)

2) duplicate http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard)

Thanks

Done and done. Thank you. :-D

Regards, Brad

What was the name of these packages ?

-- Cédric Girard

Yes, brad just annihilated those packages in mere seconds, what were the names?

-Tom Hatch

Um...uh...

I don't quite remember to be quite honest. I did verify that they were obsolete/duplicates, however, so I suppose there's no harm done.

Heh, I am not worried about harm, just curious! Congrats on being so fast on the draw!

Ng Oon-Ee

12:25 a.m.

On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 17:01 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:

...

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Brad Fanella wrote:

...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:

...
2011/1/10 Cédric Girard

...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella < bradfanella@archlinux.us

...
wrote:

...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher wrote:

...
Hi, can somebody delete this packages...

1) obsolete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)

2) duplicate http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard)

Thanks

Done and done. Thank you. :-D

Regards, Brad

What was the name of these packages ?

-- Cédric Girard

Yes, brad just annihilated those packages in mere seconds, what were the names?

-Tom Hatch

Um...uh...

I don't quite remember to be quite honest. I did verify that they were obsolete/duplicates, however, so I suppose there's no harm done.

Heh, I am not worried about harm, just curious! Congrats on being so fast on the draw!

On a related note: don't you guys sleep/work/do-something-else-other-than-read-aur-general-mails? =)

Brad Fanella

12:35 a.m.

2011/1/10 Ng Oon-Ee :

...

On a related note: don't you guys sleep/work/do-something-else-other-than-read-aur-general-mails? =)

Sleep? What is this "sleep" you speak of?

Ng Oon-Ee

1:22 a.m.

On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 18:35 -0600, Brad Fanella wrote:

...

2011/1/10 Ng Oon-Ee :

...
On a related note: don't you guys sleep/work/do-something-else-other-than-read-aur-general-mails? =)

Sleep? What is this "sleep" you speak of?

Ah. I thought so =)

Peter Lewis

10:18 a.m.

On Tuesday 11 January 2011 00:35:18 Brad Fanella wrote:

...

2011/1/10 Ng Oon-Ee :

...
On a related note: don't you guys sleep/work/do-something-else-other-than-read-aur-general-mails? =)

Sleep? What is this "sleep" you speak of?

Where's Xyne when you need him? I think you mean "sleep of which you speak" ;-P

Xyne

6:49 p.m.

Peter Lewis wrote:

...

...
Sleep? What is this "sleep" you speak of?

Where's Xyne when you need him?

I think you mean "sleep of which you speak" ;-P

Meh, I disagree with the rule not to end sentences with a preposition. Sometimes it's just the most natural way to phrase it. Afaik, it only gained acceptance due to its use as a shibboleth. I wouldn't be surprised if it were dreamt up by the same Latin grammarians who decided that "to" is part of the verb's infinitive and thus should never be split from it. If I ever find their graves, I intend *to gladly spit* on them. The only "grammatical error" that annoys me is when people use "and I" when it should be "and me", and that's only because they are actively trying to speak "correctly" and yet failing miserably. "I went to the store." -> "My friend and I went to the store." "The owner threw me out." -> "The owner threw my friend and me out." "The owner threw I out." FAIL "The owner threw my friend and I out." Same thing. FAIL. Hypercorrectionism ftl. *heads off to get his Grammar Nazi promotion*

Evangelos Foutras

7:22 p.m.

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Xyne wrote:

...

Peter Lewis wrote:

...
...
Sleep? What is this "sleep" you speak of?

Where's Xyne when you need him?

I think you mean "sleep of which you speak" ;-P

Meh, I disagree with the rule not to end sentences with a preposition. Sometimes it's just the most natural way to phrase it. Afaik, it only gained acceptance due to its use as a shibboleth. I wouldn't be surprised if it were dreamt up by the same Latin grammarians who decided that "to" is part of the verb's infinitive and thus should never be split from it. If I ever find their graves, I intend *to gladly spit* on them.

The only "grammatical error" that annoys me is when people use "and I" when it should be "and me", and that's only because they are actively trying to speak "correctly" and yet failing miserably.

"I went to the store." -> "My friend and I went to the store." "The owner threw me out." -> "The owner threw my friend and me out."

"The owner threw I out." FAIL "The owner threw my friend and I out." Same thing. FAIL.

Hypercorrectionism ftl.

*heads off to get his Grammar Nazi promotion*

lol u mad bro

Xyne

7:40 p.m.

Evangelos Foutras wrote:

...

lol u mad bro

Sorry, this isn't Archan.

Ng Oon-Ee

11:17 p.m.

On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:40 +0100, Xyne wrote:

...

Evangelos Foutras wrote:

...
lol u mad bro

Sorry, this isn't Archan.

Could have fooled me.

Brad Fanella

9:02 p.m.

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Peter Lewis wrote:

...

Where's Xyne when you need him?

I think you mean "sleep of which you speak" ;-P

...

From the looks of it, a preposition can end a sentence if it is

Nope. Sorry. You're wrong. :-P Grammarians have come to the consensus that it is alright to end a sentence with a preposition, in cases such as "What did you step on?". preceded by a verb (at least from what I have observed).

Peter Lewis

12 Jan 12 Jan

11:25 a.m.

On Tuesday 11 January 2011 21:02:31 Brad Fanella wrote:

...

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Peter Lewis wrote:

...
Where's Xyne when you need him?

I think you mean "sleep of which you speak" ;-P

Nope. Sorry. You're wrong. :-P

Grammarians have come to the consensus that it is alright to end a sentence with a preposition, in cases such as "What did you step on?". From the looks of it, a preposition can end a sentence if it is preceded by a verb (at least from what I have observed).

Meh, that is just something up with which I will not put! (But yes, you're right. But it is fun.)

Thomas S Hatch

11 Jan 11 Jan

12:36 a.m.

2011/1/10 Ng Oon-Ee

...

...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Brad Fanella
...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:

...
2011/1/10 Cédric Girard

...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella < bradfanella@archlinux.us

...
wrote:

...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher wrote: > Hi, > can somebody delete this packages... > > 1) obsolete > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068 > the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli) > > 2) duplicate > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238 > the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard) > > Thanks >

Done and done. Thank you. :-D

Regards, Brad

What was the name of these packages ?

-- Cédric Girard

Yes, brad just annihilated those packages in mere seconds, what were

On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 17:01 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: the

...
...
...
names?

-Tom Hatch

Um...uh...

I don't quite remember to be quite honest. I did verify that they were obsolete/duplicates, however, so I suppose there's no harm done.

Heh, I am not worried about harm, just curious! Congrats on being so fast on the draw!

On a related note: don't you guys sleep/work/do-something-else-other-than-read-aur-general-mails? =)

I knew my life was missing something :) No, my gmail is also my work email, so I am almost always close by :) -Tom Hatch

Evangelos Foutras

3:05 a.m.

2011/1/11 Cédric Girard :

...

What was the name of these packages ?

Using my brand new time machine, I went back in time and noted their names; borderless-elementary-gtk-theme and nautilus-elementary-ur respectively.

Brad Fanella

3:07 a.m.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:

...

2011/1/11 Cédric Girard :

...
What was the name of these packages ?

Using my brand new time machine, I went back in time and noted their names; borderless-elementary-gtk-theme and nautilus-elementary-ur respectively.

That looks absolutely correct to me; but I'm sure my input doesn't matter, as I'm no match for your magical time machine.

Thomas S Hatch

3:13 a.m.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Brad Fanella wrote:

...

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:

...
2011/1/11 Cédric Girard :

...
What was the name of these packages ?

Using my brand new time machine, I went back in time and noted their names; borderless-elementary-gtk-theme and nautilus-elementary-ur respectively.

Awesome, any way I can take a look at your time machine, it is a delorean? A Tardis? :)

Really though.... what is this time machine?

Evangelos Foutras

3:25 a.m.

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:

...

Really though.... what is this time machine?

I might have exaggerated a little bit about the time machine part. :3 ... Or maybe I do have a real time machine and I'm keeping its existence a secret (albeit not doing a great job at it). ... Nah, it was just cached pages of those links by Google. ... *Hops into the time machine to go back and warn his past self about mentioning the machine in public.*

Thomas S Hatch

3:28 a.m.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:

...

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:

...
Really though.... what is this time machine?

I might have exaggerated a little bit about the time machine part. :3

...

Or maybe I do have a real time machine and I'm keeping its existence a secret (albeit not doing a great job at it).

...

Nah, it was just cached pages of those links by Google.

...

*Hops into the time machine to go back and warn his past self about mentioning the machine in public.*

pfft <witty> I should have thought of that! Thanks!

Brad Fanella

3:58 a.m.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote:

...

...
Awesome, any way I can take a look at your time machine, it is a delorean? A Tardis? :)

21:32 CST in #archlinux-tu Exact same comment. Exact. Same. Comment.

Cédric Girard

9:36 a.m.

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:

...

2011/1/11 Cédric Girard :

...
What was the name of these packages ?

Using my brand new time machine, I went back in time and noted their names; borderless-elementary-gtk-theme and nautilus-elementary-ur respectively.

Thank you. I indeed should have used the same time machine instead of spamming the ML. Sorry about that... Regards, -- Cédric Girard

4861

Age (days ago)

4863

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

23 comments

8 participants

participants (8)

Brad Fanella
Cédric Girard
Evangelos Foutras
Matthias Rascher
Ng Oon-Ee
Peter Lewis
Thomas S Hatch
Xyne