On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 22:41 +0200, stefan-husmann@t-online.de wrote:

...

-----Original Message----- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:57:00 +0200 Subject: [aur-general] the gimmie package From: "M. Rawash" <mrawash@gmail.com> To: aur-general@archlinux.org

gimmie is completely broken in community, so please, either someone fix it, or move it to unsupported so i can adopt it (after you orphan it of course)

Regards, M Rawash

Hello,

I do not notice any bug reports concerning gimmie. Please file one if it is broken.

Regards Stefan

sorry, i usually build a package locally before i complain about it. nothing is wrong with gimmie under arch, it's just the binary package that is broken, a proper repackaging should do the trick.. regards m rawash

On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 00:51 +0200, stefan-husmann@t-online.de wrote:

-----Original Message----- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:08:14 +0200 Subject: Re: [aur-general] the gimmie package From: "M. Rawash" <mrawash@gmail.com> To: aur-general@archlinux.org

sorry, i usually build a package locally before i complain about it. nothing is wrong with gimmie under arch, it's just the binary package that is broken, a proper repackaging should do the trick..

regards m rawash

Hello,

please nevertheless file a bug report. What architecture did you install the binary package on? Error messages? I installed the binary package and there seems nothing wrong for me, I did not need to rebuild.

Stefan

well, i cannot reproduce it now, since it's been fixed, but you can read the latest two comments at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7793 , which is exactly what i used to get before rebuilding (using a clean PKGBUILD). my arch is i686. regards