Ray Rashif schivmeister@gmail.com wrote:

*[ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27760 ] linux-phc-amd-module<duplicate of> phc-k8 [ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22953 ]* *[ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18310 ] acpi-cpufreq-phc<deprecated by> phc-intel [ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24980 ]*

Deleted.

-- Chris

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:31:13 +0800 Ray Rashif schivmeister@gmail.com wrote:

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19507 - renamed to ffado http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19112 - renamed to ffado-svn

(there's no need for a reply, just delete them)

I'm just a user, but have you thought of, that these replies are also of help for the TUs in coordinating their time?

Just my 2 cents… - -- Jabber: atsutane@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4

2009/10/23 Chris Brannon cmbrannon79@gmail.com

Thoresten Toepper wrote:

...

I'm just a user, but have you thought of, that these replies are also of help for the TUs in coordinating their time? Just my 2 cents.

That's a good point. FWIW, I deleted the original poster's packages.

-- Chris

err..what I meant was there's no need for a reply if the message is just "deleted" :) I thought that would save his/her time.

Thanks and cheers!

2009/11/7 Ray Rashif schivmeister@gmail.com

This is more of a heads up, because I don't quite know which of the two should be deleted.

cairo-wglitz <-> cairo-glitz *

• looks like an upload just because the other was outdated, or to tango

along with user's other related packages.

cairo-dock-plug-ins <-> cairo-dock-plugins *

• Again, probably it was outdated, or someone simply wanted to change the

name.

Add another one which can be deleted immediately:

kibaplugins-svn (orphan and superseded by kiba-plugins-svn)