[aur-general] First Package
My first package in AUR was submitted today, someone could check to see if I did not crap? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19751 Thank you. --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sistematico.org lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org
It seems good, well done! On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Lucas Salies Brum <lucas@archlinux.com.br>wrote:
My first package in AUR was submitted today, someone could check to see if I did not crap? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19751
Thank you. --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sistematico.org lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Lucas Salies Brum <lucas@archlinux.com.br> wrote:
My first package in AUR was submitted today, someone could check to see if I did not crap? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19751
This package shouldn't be on [extra].. ? Since is an optdepend from amsn .. can any clarify this?
Thank you.
Your welcome. -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Linux Counter: #359909
apparently this is not the farsight2 package. 2009/4/7 Angel Velásquez <angvp@archlinux.com.ve>
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Lucas Salies Brum <lucas@archlinux.com.br> wrote:
My first package in AUR was submitted today, someone could check to see if I did not crap? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19751
This package shouldn't be on [extra].. ? Since is an optdepend from amsn .. can any clarify this?
Thank you.
Your welcome.
-- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Linux Counter: #359909
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:51:24 -0400 Lucas Salies Brum <lucas@archlinux.com.br> wrote:
My first package in AUR was submitted today, someone could check to see if I did not crap? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19751
Thank you. --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sistematico.org lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org
I'd do a few minor things different but you can guess what from the recent discussions. Since it's actively developed afaik I'd bug upstream about the compiletime warnings instead of applying a patch. Philipp
Many distributions does not use gcc-4.3 at the moment and so some developers does not want to patch right now. At least, that was what I have been said for supertux2. 2009/4/7 <hollunder@gmx.at>:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:51:24 -0400 Lucas Salies Brum <lucas@archlinux.com.br> wrote:
My first package in AUR was submitted today, someone could check to see if I did not crap? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19751
Thank you. --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sistematico.org lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org
I'd do a few minor things different but you can guess what from the recent discussions. Since it's actively developed afaik I'd bug upstream about the compiletime warnings instead of applying a patch.
Philipp
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:36:05 +0200 Cilyan Olowen <gaknar@gmail.com> wrote:
Many distributions does not use gcc-4.3 at the moment and so some developers does not want to patch right now. At least, that was what I have been said for supertux2.
Hmm, so far every dev I talked do was quite glad to hear about it and fixed it. I don't think those changes actually break compilation with older gcc versions, mostly the newer ones are just stricter. Also, distributions that ship old software ship old software, so it takes ages until they get the new version anyway. But oh well, if they don't want it..
hollunder@gmx.at schrieb:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:51:24 -0400 Lucas Salies Brum <lucas@archlinux.com.br> wrote:
My first package in AUR was submitted today, someone could check to see if I did not crap? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19751
Thank you. --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sistematico.org lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org
I'd do a few minor things different but you can guess what from the recent discussions. Since it's actively developed afaik I'd bug upstream about the compiletime warnings instead of applying a patch.
Philipp
Not "instead of", do both :) Well done!
participants (6)
-
Ali H. Caliskan
-
Angel Velásquez
-
Cilyan Olowen
-
hollunder＠gmx.at
-
Lucas Salies Brum
-
Stefan Husmann