apparently this is not the farsight2 package. 2009/4/7 Angel Velásquez

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Lucas Salies Brum wrote:

...

My first package in AUR was submitted today, someone could check to see if I did not crap? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19751

This package shouldn't be on [extra].. ? Since is an optdepend from amsn .. can any clarify this?

...

Thank you.

Your welcome.

-- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Linux Counter: #359909

Many distributions does not use gcc-4.3 at the moment and so some developers does not want to patch right now. At least, that was what I have been said for supertux2. 2009/4/7 :

On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:51:24 -0400 Lucas Salies Brum wrote:

...

My first package in AUR was submitted today, someone could check to see if I did not crap? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19751

Thank you. --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sistematico.org lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org

I'd do a few minor things different but you can guess what from the recent discussions. Since it's actively developed afaik I'd bug upstream about the compiletime warnings instead of applying a patch.

Philipp

hollunder@gmx.at schrieb:

On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:51:24 -0400 Lucas Salies Brum wrote:

...

My first package in AUR was submitted today, someone could check to see if I did not crap? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19751

Thank you. --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sistematico.org lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org

I'd do a few minor things different but you can guess what from the recent discussions. Since it's actively developed afaik I'd bug upstream about the compiletime warnings instead of applying a patch.

Philipp

Not "instead of", do both :) Well done!