[aur-general] Source packages in the AUR
Is it OK to upload PKGBUILDs like https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ga/gawk-source/PKGBUILD ?
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazewicz@gmail.com> wrote:
Is it OK to upload PKGBUILDs like https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ga/gawk-source/PKGBUILD ?
This package doesn't do bad things like duplicate an official one or violate a copyright. It seems perfectly useless btw. Cheers, -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Sébastien Luttringer <seblu@seblu.net> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazewicz@gmail.com> wrote:
Is it OK to upload PKGBUILDs like https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ga/gawk-source/PKGBUILD ?
This package doesn't do bad things like duplicate an official one or violate a copyright.
That's right.
It seems perfectly useless btw.
This is what I meant :-)
Cheers,
-- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A
We have no policies against useless packages. I have faith that the AUR web system + devs/TUs will be able to keep AUR useful, also in the future, despite of this, though. :) - Alexander / xyproto
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Alexander Rødseth <rodseth@gmail.com>wrote:
We have no policies against useless packages. I have faith that the AUR web system + devs/TUs will be able to keep AUR useful, also in the future, despite of this, though. :)
- Alexander / xyproto
That is incorrect. There are policies: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_User_Guidelines#Submitting_packages - Make sure the package is useful. Will anyone else want to use this package? Is it extremely specialized? If more than a few people would find this package useful, it is appropriate for submission. - The AUR and official repositories are intended for packages which install generally software and software-related content, including one or more of the following: executable(s); config file(s); online or offline documentation for specific software or the Arch Linux distribution as a whole; media intended to be used directly by software.
Missed that one. TIL :) -- Alexander / xyproto
On 09/13/13 at 01:11pm, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Alexander Rødseth <rodseth@gmail.com>wrote:
We have no policies against useless packages. I have faith that the AUR web system + devs/TUs will be able to keep AUR useful, also in the future, despite of this, though. :)
- Alexander / xyproto
That is incorrect. There are policies: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_User_Guidelines#Submitting_packages
- Make sure the package is useful. Will anyone else want to use this package? Is it extremely specialized? If more than a few people would find this package useful, it is appropriate for submission.
- The AUR and official repositories are intended for packages which install generally software and software-related content, including one or more of the following: executable(s); config file(s); online or offline documentation for specific software or the Arch Linux distribution as a whole; media intended to be used directly by software.
Since these source packages aren't of any use, I'm removing it and CC'ing the AUR submitter. -- Jelle van der Waa
"Eric Bélanger" <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
That is incorrect. There are policies: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_User_Guidelines#Submitting_packages
- Make sure the package is useful. Will anyone else want to use this package? Is it extremely specialized? If more than a few people would find this package useful, it is appropriate for submission.
- The AUR and official repositories are intended for packages which install generally software and software-related content, including one or more of the following: executable(s); config file(s); online or offline documentation for specific software or the Arch Linux distribution as a whole; media intended to be used directly by software.
Those are by no means policies! Unlike [1], the page is freely editable, and can contain pretty much anything. [1]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards
participants (6)
-
Alexander Rødseth
-
alexander.r@gmx.com
-
Eric Bélanger
-
Jelle van der Waa
-
Karol Blazewicz
-
Sébastien Luttringer