Can someone please orphan phpstorm [1]? The maintainer hasn't updated any of his packages since January. I have an updated PKGBUILD and I'm willing to maintain it.
Thanks.
On 29/10/11 13:18, D. Can Celasun wrote:
Can someone please orphan phpstorm [1]? The maintainer hasn't updated any of his packages since January. I have an updated PKGBUILD and I'm willing to maintain it.
Thanks.
Did you send him an email 2 weeks ago?
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jelle van der Waa jelle@vdwaa.nl wrote:
On 29/10/11 13:18, D. Can Celasun wrote:
Can someone please orphan phpstorm [1]? The maintainer hasn't updated any of his packages since January. I have an updated PKGBUILD and I'm willing to maintain it.
Thanks.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=45651https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45651
Did you send him an email 2 weeks ago?
-- Jelle van der Waa
Well, no, but someone flagged the package in March, and someone else reminded him again in June, so I'm pretty sure he won't mind if you orphan it.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:00 PM, D. Can Celasun dcelasun@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jelle van der Waa jelle@vdwaa.nl wrote:
On 29/10/11 13:18, D. Can Celasun wrote:
Can someone please orphan phpstorm [1]? The maintainer hasn't updated any of his packages since January. I have an updated PKGBUILD and I'm willing to maintain it.
Thanks.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=45651https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45651
Did you send him an email 2 weeks ago?
-- Jelle van der Waa
Well, no, but someone flagged the package in March, and someone else reminded him again in June, so I'm pretty sure he won't mind if you orphan it.
Uhm.. if there are no further objections, can someone please go ahead and orphan this?
Am Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:22:10 +0300 schrieb "D. Can Celasun" dcelasun@gmail.com:
Uhm.. if there are no further objections, can someone please go ahead and orphan this?
As Jelle already asked you to do this, you should first send the maintainer an e-mail to his e-mail address(es) mentioned in the PKGBUILD and in his AUR profile. If you won't get an answer or if he won't update the package within two weeks you can send the orphan request again.
Heiko
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Heiko Baums lists@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:22:10 +0300 schrieb "D. Can Celasun" dcelasun@gmail.com:
Uhm.. if there are no further objections, can someone please go ahead and orphan this?
As Jelle already asked you to do this, you should first send the maintainer an e-mail to his e-mail address(es) mentioned in the PKGBUILD and in his AUR profile. If you won't get an answer or if he won't update the package within two weeks you can send the orphan request again.
Heiko
This is the first time I've come across such a thing. Usually (as in, every single time till now) when the maintainer hasn't cared for *any* of his packages for *10* months, it is assumed that he is no longer interested in said package(s). Furthermore, as it can be seen from the AUR page, previous attempts to contact the maintainer have failed.
If, after all that, I'm still expected to send an e-mail *and* wait for 2 weeks for a reply, I could certainly care less about updating an insignificant package and do something useful for the community.
Cheers, Can
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:43:32AM +0300, D. Can Celasun wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Heiko Baums lists@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:22:10 +0300 schrieb "D. Can Celasun" dcelasun@gmail.com:
Uhm.. if there are no further objections, can someone please go ahead and orphan this?
As Jelle already asked you to do this, you should first send the maintainer an e-mail to his e-mail address(es) mentioned in the PKGBUILD and in his AUR profile. If you won't get an answer or if he won't update the package within two weeks you can send the orphan request again.
Heiko
This is the first time I've come across such a thing. Usually (as in, every single time till now) when the maintainer hasn't cared for *any* of his packages for *10* months, it is assumed that he is no longer interested in said package(s).
Agreed. Disowned.
d
Furthermore, as it can be seen from the AUR page, previous attempts to contact the maintainer have failed.
If, after all that, I'm still expected to send an e-mail *and* wait for 2 weeks for a reply, I could certainly care less about updating an insignificant package and do something useful for the community.
Cheers, Can
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Dave Reisner d@falconindy.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:43:32AM +0300, D. Can Celasun wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Heiko Baums lists@baums-on-web.de
wrote:
Am Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:22:10 +0300 schrieb "D. Can Celasun" dcelasun@gmail.com:
Uhm.. if there are no further objections, can someone please go ahead and orphan this?
As Jelle already asked you to do this, you should first send the maintainer an e-mail to his e-mail address(es) mentioned in the PKGBUILD and in his AUR profile. If you won't get an answer or if he won't update the package within two weeks you can send the orphan request again.
Heiko
This is the first time I've come across such a thing. Usually (as in,
every
single time till now) when the maintainer hasn't cared for *any* of his packages for *10* months, it is assumed that he is no longer interested
in
said package(s).
Agreed. Disowned.
Thank you. Package adopted and updated.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:12 AM, D. Can Celasun dcelasun@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Dave Reisner d@falconindy.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:43:32AM +0300, D. Can Celasun wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Heiko Baums lists@baums-on-web.de
wrote:
Am Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:22:10 +0300 schrieb "D. Can Celasun" dcelasun@gmail.com:
Uhm.. if there are no further objections, can someone please go ahead and orphan this?
As Jelle already asked you to do this, you should first send the maintainer an e-mail to his e-mail address(es) mentioned in the PKGBUILD and in his AUR profile. If you won't get an answer or if he won't update the package within two weeks you can send the orphan request again.
Heiko
This is the first time I've come across such a thing. Usually (as in,
every
single time till now) when the maintainer hasn't cared for *any* of his packages for *10* months, it is assumed that he is no longer interested
in
said package(s).
Agreed. Disowned.
Thank you. Package adopted and updated.
+1 That's why we can have nice things :-D
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org