Am 24.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Cédric Girard:

utorrent-server [1] is a duplicate of utserver [2]. It has no maintainer, is outdated and has a bad PKGBUILD.

Thanks,

[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40600 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602

Done, thank you.

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:

Am 24.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Cédric Girard:

...

utorrent-server [1] is a duplicate of utserver [2]. It has no maintainer, is outdated and has a bad PKGBUILD.

Thanks,

[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40600 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602

Done, thank you.

A new utorrent-server [1] has been uploaded 2 weeks later. It is a duplicate of utserver [2]. They have a similar PKGBUILD, except that [1] handles both arch and has, I think, a better naming. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43253 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602 -- Cédric Girard

On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 17:42 +0100, Cédric Girard wrote:

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:

...

Am 24.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Cédric Girard:

...

utorrent-server [1] is a duplicate of utserver [2]. It has no maintainer, is outdated and has a bad PKGBUILD.

Thanks,

[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40600 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602

Done, thank you.

A new utorrent-server [1] has been uploaded 2 weeks later. It is a duplicate of utserver [2]. They have a similar PKGBUILD, except that [1] handles both arch and has, I think, a better naming.

[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43253 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602

I have checked the packages and utorrent-server is better packaged then the second since it has a better name and support for both arches. Can't we just notify packager [1] to use package [2] and remove [1] :P -- Jelle van der Waa

Am 06.01.2011 18:32, schrieb Cédric Girard:

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:

...

Am 06.01.2011 17:42, schrieb Cédric Girard:

...

[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40600

...

...

[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602

Sent mail to the maintainer of utserver.

I've received a mail from the maintainer of utorrent-server. Here are its (justified) motivations to create a new package :

First of all, I added the PKGBUILD for a few reasons:

...

1. Chris-Kan from utserver did not maintain it, it has been flagged out ouf date for a while 2. Did not want support 64bits systems even thought not compatible 3. For the name, it's actually because uTorrent team changed the name 4. His PKGBUILD does not work: Comment by: laasonen on Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:23:08 +0000 "/tmp/packerbuild-0/utserver/utserver/PKGBUILD: line 25: cd: /tmp/packerbuild-0/utserver/utserver/src/bittorrent-server-v3_0: No such file or directory"

It should be: "cd $srcdir/utorrent-server-v3_0"

You should also add support for x86_64.

Regards,

Thank you. These are valid and good reasons. Nevertheless it would have been a better way to do a orphaning request on this list than to upload a duplicate. Anyway, Jelle already wrote a comment on AUR comment page for utserver. So the problem will be solved in short. BTW, thank you for notifying the duplicate. Regards Stefan

________________________________ De :Stefan Husmann À :Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) Envoyé le : Jeu 6 janvier 2011, 18h 48min 09s Objet : Re: [aur-general] utorrent-server deletion request Am 06.01.2011 18:32, schrieb Cédric Girard:

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:

...

Am 06.01.2011 17:42, schrieb Cédric Girard:

...

[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40600

...

...

[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602

Sent mail to the maintainer of utserver.

I've received a mail from the maintainer of utorrent-server. Here are its (justified) motivations to create a new package :

First of all, I added the PKGBUILD for a few reasons:

...

1. Chris-Kan from utserver did not maintain it, it has been flagged out ouf date for a while 2. Did not want support 64bits systems even thought not compatible 3. For the name, it's actually because uTorrent team changed the name 4. His PKGBUILD does not work: Comment by: laasonen on Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:23:08 +0000 "/tmp/packerbuild-0/utserver/utserver/PKGBUILD: line 25: cd: /tmp/packerbuild-0/utserver/utserver/src/bittorrent-server-v3_0: No such file or directory"

It should be: "cd $srcdir/utorrent-server-v3_0"

You should also add support for x86_64.

Regards,

Thank you. These are valid and good reasons. Nevertheless it would have been a better way to do a orphaning request on this list than to upload a duplicate. Anyway, Jelle already wrote a comment on AUR comment page for utserver. So the problem will be solved in short. BTW, thank you for notifying the duplicate. Regards Stefan Sorry for uploading a dublicate package, I come from Gentoo and was not used to AUR yet, like I said, utserver was not maintained anymore, and I did not oficially asked for this package, but as told to Cédric, I did not want to take over chris-kan's package, but just maintained it while he did not answer...... Btw, my PKGBUILD is based on his, and I will be very happy to get his help on it! I promise that I will my best to maintain utorrent-server (which is by the way in Alpha and has a big bug known upstream to crash.... We are working on this at this moment) And as a "new" PKGBUILD maintainer, I am open to any suggestions or help by anyone, and of course I would love, chris-kan's advice on my PKGBUILD as mine is based on his!! Again, sorry to not have followed all the rules..... Beretta92 Pierre-Antoine Vanpé

Am 06.01.2011 18:29, schrieb Jelle van der Waa:

On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 17:42 +0100, Cédric Girard wrote:

...

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:

...

Am 24.10.2010 20:11, schrieb Cédric Girard:

...

utorrent-server [1] is a duplicate of utserver [2]. It has no maintainer, is outdated and has a bad PKGBUILD.

Thanks,

[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40600 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602

Done, thank you.

A new utorrent-server [1] has been uploaded 2 weeks later. It is a duplicate of utserver [2]. They have a similar PKGBUILD, except that [1] handles both arch and has, I think, a better naming.

[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43253 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602

I have checked the packages and utorrent-server is better packaged then the second since it has a better name and support for both arches.

Can't we just notify packager [1] to use package [2] and remove [1] :P

Hello, the packager was emailed by me and did not answer yet. So I'd say yes for removel. Regards Stefan