[aur-general] xulrunner in AUR and extra?
I'm going through the orphans list in the AUR at the moment looking for packages to adopt, and came across xulrunner. Given then xulrunner is now in extra, shouldn't it be removed from the AUR?
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Phillip Smith <arch-general@fukawi2.nl> wrote:
I'm going through the orphans list in the AUR at the moment looking for packages to adopt, and came across xulrunner. Given then xulrunner is now in extra, shouldn't it be removed from the AUR?
The package in AUR is xulrunner-1.8, not xulrunner. I guess it's there because it is (was?) required for apps that didn't worked with the latest xulrunner.
The package in AUR is xulrunner-1.8, not xulrunner. I guess it's there because it is (was?) required for apps that didn't worked with the latest xulrunner.
Ah, I didn't notice that... Crisis averted! ;)
I know it used to be required for Aptana, which is why it was uploaded (I think). Now it isn't required by it anymore, though. Smartboy On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com>wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Phillip Smith <arch-general@fukawi2.nl> wrote:
I'm going through the orphans list in the AUR at the moment looking for packages to adopt, and came across xulrunner. Given then xulrunner is now in extra, shouldn't it be removed from the AUR?
The package in AUR is xulrunner-1.8, not xulrunner. I guess it's there because it is (was?) required for apps that didn't worked with the latest xulrunner.
Smartboy schrieb:
I know it used to be required for Aptana, which is why it was uploaded (I think). Now it isn't required by it anymore, though.
Smartboy
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com>wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Phillip Smith <arch-general@fukawi2.nl> wrote:
I'm going through the orphans list in the AUR at the moment looking for packages to adopt, and came across xulrunner. Given then xulrunner is now in extra, shouldn't it be removed from the AUR?
The package in AUR is xulrunner-1.8, not xulrunner. I guess it's there because it is (was?) required for apps that didn't worked with the latest xulrunner.
Hello, zattoo still needs it. It is flagged out of date, though. Regards Stefan.
Hi, On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:29:34PM +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Hello,
zattoo still needs it. It is flagged out of date, though. I submitted xulrunner-1.8 some time ago to AUR. Now there is no need for this package as zattoo has no client for Linux anymore. It is only available as a browser-app. Xulrunner-1.8 can now be safely deleted imo.
Vlad --
vlad schrieb:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:29:34PM +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Hello,
zattoo still needs it. It is flagged out of date, though. I submitted xulrunner-1.8 some time ago to AUR. Now there is no need for this package as zattoo has no client for Linux anymore. It is only available as a browser-app. Xulrunner-1.8 can now be safely deleted imo.
Vlad
Hello, the tarball of zattoo might not be supported anymore, but it is still downloadable. So the PKGBUILDs of zattoo and zattoo-ch might still work. I did not test them, though. Regards Stefan
participants (5)
-
Eric Bélanger
-
Phillip Smith
-
Smartboy
-
Stefan Husmann
-
vlad