[aur-general] Request deletion lv2-c++-tools
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23651 It seems like the c++ in the name causes problems, at least with yaourt. I made a new package with cpp instead. Philipp
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 08:34, <hollunder@gmx.at> wrote:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23651
It seems like the c++ in the name causes problems, at least with yaourt. I made a new package with cpp instead.
Philipp
Yaourt isn't an official tool, and any limitations in it should be handled by its authors. If the correct name is with ++, I see no reason to change it. There are packages in the main repos which have ++ in pkgname as well, so it's not really a unique issue.
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:43:22 -0400 Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 08:34, <hollunder@gmx.at> wrote:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23651
It seems like the c++ in the name causes problems, at least with yaourt. I made a new package with cpp instead.
Philipp
Yaourt isn't an official tool, and any limitations in it should be handled by its authors. If the correct name is with ++, I see no reason to change it. There are packages in the main repos which have ++ in pkgname as well, so it's not really a unique issue.
Ok, so either we keep it working for now (keep the cpp version) or break it and keep it correct (c++ version). Guess it's you choice at this time, please delete one of the two, I'll adjust the one affected package (ll-plugins). Philipp
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:58:58PM +0200, hollunder@gmx.at wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:43:22 -0400 Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 08:34, <hollunder@gmx.at> wrote:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23651
It seems like the c++ in the name causes problems, at least with yaourt. I made a new package with cpp instead.
Philipp
Yaourt isn't an official tool, and any limitations in it should be handled by its authors. If the correct name is with ++, I see no reason to change it. There are packages in the main repos which have ++ in pkgname as well, so it's not really a unique issue.
Ok, so either we keep it working for now (keep the cpp version) or break it and keep it correct (c++ version). Guess it's you choice at this time, please delete one of the two, I'll adjust the one affected package (ll-plugins).
Well, which one do you intend to maintain?
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:30:13 -0400 Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:58:58PM +0200, hollunder@gmx.at wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:43:22 -0400 Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 08:34, <hollunder@gmx.at> wrote:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23651
It seems like the c++ in the name causes problems, at least with yaourt. I made a new package with cpp instead.
Philipp
Yaourt isn't an official tool, and any limitations in it should be handled by its authors. If the correct name is with ++, I see no reason to change it. There are packages in the main repos which have ++ in pkgname as well, so it's not really a unique issue.
Ok, so either we keep it working for now (keep the cpp version) or break it and keep it correct (c++ version). Guess it's you choice at this time, please delete one of the two, I'll adjust the one affected package (ll-plugins).
Well, which one do you intend to maintain?
Either one, the one with c++ is the correct name but just won't work with namcap until the '+' bug is fixed. It's not like it was high profile and the author vanished from the net some time ago so I guess he won't care either. Philipp
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:30:13 -0400 Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:58:58PM +0200, hollunder@gmx.at wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:43:22 -0400 Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 08:34, <hollunder@gmx.at> wrote:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23651
It seems like the c++ in the name causes problems, at least with yaourt. I made a new package with cpp instead.
Philipp
Yaourt isn't an official tool, and any limitations in it should be handled by its authors. If the correct name is with ++, I see no reason to change it. There are packages in the main repos which have ++ in pkgname as well, so it's not really a unique issue.
Ok, so either we keep it working for now (keep the cpp version) or break it and keep it correct (c++ version). Guess it's you choice at this time, please delete one of the two, I'll adjust the one affected package (ll-plugins).
Well, which one do you intend to maintain?
Well, I just decided. I used the '++' package as example in the yaourt bug report. It also is the proper name. breaking this package in yaourt isn't a big problem since it's low profile anyway. Please remove: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25310 Best regards, Philipp
2009/4/6 <hollunder@gmx.at>:
Well, I just decided. I used the '++' package as example in the yaourt bug report. It also is the proper name. breaking this package in yaourt isn't a big problem since it's low profile anyway.
Please remove: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25310
Best regards, Philipp
deleted. -- Abhishek
participants (4)
-
Abhishek Dasgupta
-
Daenyth Blank
-
hollunder＠gmx.at
-
Loui Chang