[aur-general] Request deletion lv2-c++-tools - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

newer
[aur-general] How to handle...

[aur-general] Request deletion lv2-c++-tools

older
[aur-general] AUR package removal...

hollunder＠gmx.at

6 Apr 2009 6 Apr '09

12:34 p.m.

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23651 It seems like the c++ in the name causes problems, at least with yaourt. I made a new package with cpp instead. Philipp

Show replies by date

Daenyth Blank

6 Apr 6 Apr

12:43 p.m.

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 08:34, wrote:

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23651

It seems like the c++ in the name causes problems, at least with yaourt. I made a new package with cpp instead.

Philipp

Yaourt isn't an official tool, and any limitations in it should be handled by its authors. If the correct name is with ++, I see no reason to change it. There are packages in the main repos which have ++ in pkgname as well, so it's not really a unique issue.

hollunder＠gmx.at

12:58 p.m.

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:43:22 -0400 Daenyth Blank wrote:

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 08:34, wrote:

...
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23651

It seems like the c++ in the name causes problems, at least with yaourt. I made a new package with cpp instead.

Philipp

Yaourt isn't an official tool, and any limitations in it should be handled by its authors. If the correct name is with ++, I see no reason to change it. There are packages in the main repos which have ++ in pkgname as well, so it's not really a unique issue.

Ok, so either we keep it working for now (keep the cpp version) or break it and keep it correct (c++ version). Guess it's you choice at this time, please delete one of the two, I'll adjust the one affected package (ll-plugins). Philipp

Loui Chang

1:30 p.m.

On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:58:58PM +0200, hollunder@gmx.at wrote:

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:43:22 -0400 Daenyth Blank wrote:

...
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 08:34, wrote:

...
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23651

It seems like the c++ in the name causes problems, at least with yaourt. I made a new package with cpp instead.

Philipp

Yaourt isn't an official tool, and any limitations in it should be handled by its authors. If the correct name is with ++, I see no reason to change it. There are packages in the main repos which have ++ in pkgname as well, so it's not really a unique issue.

Ok, so either we keep it working for now (keep the cpp version) or break it and keep it correct (c++ version). Guess it's you choice at this time, please delete one of the two, I'll adjust the one affected package (ll-plugins).

Well, which one do you intend to maintain?

hollunder＠gmx.at

1:50 p.m.

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:30:13 -0400 Loui Chang wrote:

On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:58:58PM +0200, hollunder@gmx.at wrote:

...
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:43:22 -0400 Daenyth Blank wrote:

...
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 08:34, wrote:

...
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23651

It seems like the c++ in the name causes problems, at least with yaourt. I made a new package with cpp instead.

Philipp

Yaourt isn't an official tool, and any limitations in it should be handled by its authors. If the correct name is with ++, I see no reason to change it. There are packages in the main repos which have ++ in pkgname as well, so it's not really a unique issue.

Ok, so either we keep it working for now (keep the cpp version) or break it and keep it correct (c++ version). Guess it's you choice at this time, please delete one of the two, I'll adjust the one affected package (ll-plugins).

Well, which one do you intend to maintain?

Either one, the one with c++ is the correct name but just won't work with namcap until the '+' bug is fixed. It's not like it was high profile and the author vanished from the net some time ago so I guess he won't care either. Philipp

hollunder＠gmx.at

5:30 p.m.

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:30:13 -0400 Loui Chang wrote:

On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:58:58PM +0200, hollunder@gmx.at wrote:

...
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:43:22 -0400 Daenyth Blank wrote:

...
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 08:34, wrote:

...
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23651

It seems like the c++ in the name causes problems, at least with yaourt. I made a new package with cpp instead.

Philipp

Yaourt isn't an official tool, and any limitations in it should be handled by its authors. If the correct name is with ++, I see no reason to change it. There are packages in the main repos which have ++ in pkgname as well, so it's not really a unique issue.

Ok, so either we keep it working for now (keep the cpp version) or break it and keep it correct (c++ version). Guess it's you choice at this time, please delete one of the two, I'll adjust the one affected package (ll-plugins).

Well, which one do you intend to maintain?

Well, I just decided. I used the '++' package as example in the yaourt bug report. It also is the proper name. breaking this package in yaourt isn't a big problem since it's low profile anyway. Please remove: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25310 Best regards, Philipp

Abhishek Dasgupta

5:32 p.m.

2009/4/6 :

Well, I just decided. I used the '++' package as example in the yaourt bug report. It also is the proper name. breaking this package in yaourt isn't a big problem since it's low profile anyway.

Please remove: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25310

Best regards, Philipp

deleted. -- Abhishek

5509

Age (days ago)

5509

Last active (days ago)

Download

6 comments

4 participants

tags

participants (4)

Abhishek Dasgupta
Daenyth Blank
hollunder＠gmx.at
Loui Chang