Re: [aur-general] Java name guideliness
If look to the pther packages (not java) the fewers who need a version
On Thu Sep 11 14:02:41 EDT 2014, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote: they
apend the versión at the endm so for consistency whit the all others packages I think is better keep the version at the end: <vendor>-<jre/jdk>-<version>: oracle/openjdk-jre-7/8
We can't do that, because our own upstream (the OpenJDK packager) alredy decided on it. To change it you're going to have to start a bug report/feature request on our own packages. If you can change _his_ mind, then we can talk about implementing that in the AUR as well. On Thu Sep 11 18:13:11 EDT 2014, Justin Dray wrote:
The fact that one naming convention or the other being chosen is still not the issue, it's the fact that in the interim there are *both* packages in there.
Yes, I get that you're eager to get whatever parties out of there ASAP, and sort it out later. Unfortunately, that's not how it's going to play out and this discussion so far has prevented the proper way from happening as well, as I was already pointed out some time ago. Therefore, I'm taking this and my suggestions back directly to the respective maintainers, and only if they want to continue it here, we will. Det
but upstream name not necesary mean the name that the encapsulate that contain the package need to be named. There ar a handfull either throw arch and aur history and actual named packages that not follow the name. but too looking to the other packages in aur the version is alwas separate from the name of the package so in the end <namepackage>-<version> will be used. Upstream not give a version or give a "-" or a plain space for versions if ou are going to follow uptream. 2014-09-18 16:54 GMT-03:00 Det <nimetonmaili@gmail.com>:
If look to the pther packages (not java) the fewers who need a version
On Thu Sep 11 14:02:41 EDT 2014, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote: they
apend the versión at the endm so for consistency whit the all others packages I think is better keep the version at the end: <vendor>-<jre/jdk>-<version>: oracle/openjdk-jre-7/8
We can't do that, because our own upstream (the OpenJDK packager) alredy decided on it. To change it you're going to have to start a bug report/feature request on our own packages.
If you can change _his_ mind, then we can talk about implementing that in the AUR as well.
On Thu Sep 11 18:13:11 EDT 2014, Justin Dray wrote:
The fact that one naming convention or the other being chosen is still not the issue, it's the fact that in the interim there are *both* packages in there.
Yes, I get that you're eager to get whatever parties out of there ASAP, and sort it out later. Unfortunately, that's not how it's going to play out and this discussion so far has prevented the proper way from happening as well, as I was already pointed out some time ago.
Therefore, I'm taking this and my suggestions back directly to the respective maintainers, and only if they want to continue it here, we will.
Det
-- *Pablo Lezaeta*
On Fri Sep 19 00:02:27 EDT 2014, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
but upstream name not necesary mean the name that the encapsulate that contain the package need to be named.
There ar a handfull either throw arch and aur history and actual named packages that not follow the name.
but too looking to the other packages in aur the version is alwas separate from the name of the package so in the end <namepackage>-<version> will be used. Upstream not give a version or give a "-" or a plain space for versions if ou are going to follow uptream.
I'm sorry, but I didn't understand any of this. Also, please don't top-post, as already stated. Det
If you know how not topposting using gmail please that will help me, and as I stated I use gmail. and what part ou not underestand? All the official packagen in the official repos that append a version they append it as <pkgname>---<version> and NOT <pkgname><version> as is now for jre/jdk(7,6) 2014-09-19 22:46 GMT-03:00 Det <nimetonmaili@gmail.com>:
On Fri Sep 19 00:02:27 EDT 2014, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
but upstream name not necesary mean the name that the encapsulate that contain the package need to be named.
There ar a handfull either throw arch and aur history and actual named packages that not follow the name.
but too looking to the other packages in aur the version is alwas separate from the name of the package so in the end <namepackage>-<version> will be used. Upstream not give a version or give a "-" or a plain space for versions if ou are going to follow uptream.
I'm sorry, but I didn't understand any of this.
Also, please don't top-post, as already stated.
Det
-- *Pablo Lezaeta*
On Saturday, September 20, 2014 10:19:52 PM Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
If you know how not topposting using gmail please that will help me, and as I stated I use gmail.
It's actually pretty easy, although a bit more involved than it should be. When you hit reply you'll notice that at the bottom left corner of the edit box will have a button with three dots in it. Click on that (it will show the content of the message you are replying to) and move your cursor to the bottom of that text and reply there instead of at the top.
2014-09-21 0:27 GMT-03:00 Kevin Ott <supercodingmonkey@gmail.com>:
On Saturday, September 20, 2014 10:19:52 PM Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
If you know how not topposting using gmail please that will help me, and as I stated I use gmail.
It's actually pretty easy, although a bit more involved than it should be. When you hit reply you'll notice that at the bottom left corner of the edit box will have a button with three dots in it. Click on that (it will show the content of the message you are replying to) and move your cursor to the bottom of that text and reply there instead of at the top.
Well thanks, really. Now what are the options? java-jdk/jre-5/6/7/devel or {,open}jdk/jre-5/6/7/devel I keep thinking that the first is better but the seccond is what I think is the one who will ended used. -- *Pablo Lezaeta*
participants (3)
-
Det
-
Kevin Ott
-
Pablo Lezaeta Reyes