-----Original Message-----

Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:19:36 +0100 Subject: Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR From: Loui Chang To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:03:50AM +0100, stefan-husmann@t-online.de wrote:

...

findwild was mine, I did a fresh upload, that fixed it. I deleted micq (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7928) because last update was 2006 and the maintainer did not respond to the comments of several users (program was renamed to climm).

For  the other packages I left a comment. The AUR comment page looks strange. Where I expect the comment button, there is the word "poop". http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20933 is okay, there are only small files uploaded. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252 is okay, too. Thank you for notification.

I was deleting some of the files. Have a look at the tarballs though. They're much bigger than your average set of build scripts.

Where are you seeing 'poop'?

The poop is gone, sorry, I do not remember where I saw it.. Regards Stefan

-----Original Message-----

Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:39:27 +0100 Subject: Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR From: Aaron Griffin To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:36 PM, stefan-husmann@t-online.de wrote:

...

...

From: Loui Chang Where are you seeing 'poop'?

The poop is gone, sorry, I do not remember where I saw it..

This is the best exchange on this list yet.

If the button text changed, I imagine someone (wizzo?) was testing something

Oops, I probably should look up words I do not know before posting them. There may be little children reading this. :)

-----Original Message-----

Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:50:18 +0100 Subject: Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR From: Daenyth Blank To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang wrote:

...

Where are you seeing 'poop'?

I was seeing it too, when I used the link from a notification email. I think it happens when the URL is malformed... the name of the commenter was appended to the URL after the package ID, and all comments on the page were gone leaving "poop" there.

Thank you, at least I am not hallucinating.

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 06:50:18PM -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote:

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang wrote:

...

Where are you seeing 'poop'?

I was seeing it too, when I used the link from a notification email. I think it happens when the URL is malformed... the name of the commenter was appended to the URL after the package ID, and all comments on the page were gone leaving "poop" there.

And that is fixed in git now. Comments are displayed and poop is gone.

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 21:03, Loui Chang wrote:

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 06:50:18PM -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote:

...

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang wrote:

...

Where are you seeing 'poop'?

I was seeing it too, when I used the link from a notification email. I think it happens when the URL is malformed... the name of the commenter was appended to the URL after the package ID, and all comments on the page were gone leaving "poop" there.

And that is fixed in git now. Comments are displayed and poop is gone.

You're the best code plumber, loui :P