[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 16 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * exim-4.82-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.037.00-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-24 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * exim-4.82-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.037.00-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-24 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (4 total) == * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nftables-0.099-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nftables-0.099-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (16 total) == * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (i686), since 2014-01-20 * libnftnl-1.0.0-1 (x86_64), since 2014-01-20 * bbswitch-0.8-6 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * bbswitch-0.8-6 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-52 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * r8168-8.037.00-7 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * r8168-8.037.00-7 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * tp_smapi-0.41-44 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * vhba-module-20130607-24 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * vhba-module-20130607-24 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (i686), since 2014-01-26 * virtualbox-modules-4.3.6-5 (x86_64), since 2014-01-26 * acpi_call-1.1.0-2 (i686), since 2014-01-27 * acpi_call-1.1.0-2 (x86_64), since 2014-01-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. djgera - 2 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:07:04AM -0000, Arch Website Notification wrote:
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 16 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) [...]
What are these signoff-reports about? I don't know what their purpose is... Ciao, Oliver
from the wiki [0] we learn: "[…]core has fairly strict quality requirements. Developers/users need to signoff on updates before package updates are accepted.[…]" [0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Official_Repositories
participants (3)
-
Arch Website Notification
-
G. Schlisio
-
oliver