[aur-general] Realtime kernel package name for 3.0
On 23 July 2011 09:49, Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2@gmail.com> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Date: 2011/7/22 Subject: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt1 To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Cc: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Dear RT Folks,
I'm pleased to announce the 3.0-rt1 release.
Changes versus 3.0-rc7-rt0:
* Update to Linus final 3.0 release
* RTC bugfixes (scheduled for mainline/stable)
* Long standing (rt only) timer_list bug (see timers-avoid-the-base-null-otptimization-on-rt.patch in the split out quilt queue)
* Minor non exciting fixes all over the place
Known issues:
* Some weird "console=..." commandline + config dependent interactions which have been not yet investigated down to their root cause. Result in a boot hang. YMMV
Patch against 3.0 can be found here:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-3.0-rt1.patch.bz2
The split quilt queue is available at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patches-3.0-rt1.tar.bz2
This calls for a new package name. The standard kernel will be named "linux", so the obvious options are "linux-rt" and "linux-realtime". Tell us which you would prefer or suggest a different suffix. -- GPG/PGP ID: D90FA77D
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Ray Rashif <schivmeister@gmail.com> wrote:
This calls for a new package name. The standard kernel will be named "linux", so the obvious options are "linux-rt" and "linux-realtime". Tell us which you would prefer or suggest a different suffix.
linux-rt is a good choice as the suffix is widely spread and is the one used upstream. linux-realtime may be much straightforward to newcomer but we have the description for that. -- Cédric Girard
Excerpts from Ray Rashif's message of 2011-07-23 12:08:52 +0200:
On 23 July 2011 09:49, Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2@gmail.com> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Date: 2011/7/22 Subject: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt1 To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Cc: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Dear RT Folks,
I'm pleased to announce the 3.0-rt1 release.
Changes versus 3.0-rc7-rt0:
* Update to Linus final 3.0 release
* RTC bugfixes (scheduled for mainline/stable)
* Long standing (rt only) timer_list bug (see timers-avoid-the-base-null-otptimization-on-rt.patch in the split out quilt queue)
* Minor non exciting fixes all over the place
Known issues:
* Some weird "console=..." commandline + config dependent interactions which have been not yet investigated down to their root cause. Result in a boot hang. YMMV
Patch against 3.0 can be found here:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-3.0-rt1.patch.bz2
The split quilt queue is available at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patches-3.0-rt1.tar.bz2
This calls for a new package name. The standard kernel will be named "linux", so the obvious options are "linux-rt" and "linux-realtime". Tell us which you would prefer or suggest a different suffix.
How about linux-preempt_rt since this includes the actual name of the patch. In case other rt patches exist this naming would make obvious which one is meant. Otherwise I vote for the simpler linux-rt.
participants (3)
-
Cédric Girard
-
Philipp Überbacher
-
Ray Rashif