Ronald van Haren a écrit :

Hi TUs,

This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.

You can find the official discussion period here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/007010.html The reasoning why I started this removal thread can be found here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/006988.html

My vote: yes

Ronald

YES

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Ronald van Haren pressh@gmail.com wrote:

Hi TUs,

This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.

YES

Aaron "ElasticDog" Schaefer --

2008/2/21, Ronald van Haren pressh@gmail.com:

This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.

Yes.

Hey gang;

I would like to make sure we reach a sufficient amount of voting TUs to make a quorum. But I would like to also not vote either way.

So, if it is o.k. to do so, I vote to abstain.

IF this is a problem for any reason, (like not really satisfying the quorum requirements,) please let me know and I would be happy to change my vote.

Very best regards;

Bob Finch

Liviu Librescu - În veci pomenirea lui. (May his memory be eternal.)

Yes

2008/2/21, Ronald van Haren pressh@gmail.com:

Hi TUs,

This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.

You can find the official discussion period here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/007010.html The reasoning why I started this removal thread can be found here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/006988.html

My vote: yes

Ronald

YES.

Abstain.

--Abhishek Dasgupta

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Ronald van Haren pressh@gmail.com wrote:

Hi TUs,

This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.

YES!

ps: Shouldnt we use the new AUR vote interface?

Ronald van Haren wrote:

Hi TUs,

This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.

You can find the official discussion period here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/007010.html The reasoning why I started this removal thread can be found here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/006988.html

My vote: yes

Ronald

Yes.

Shinlun

Yes.

This mail ends the voting period for the removal as Trusted User of filoktetes. 21/27 (of which 3 inactive, and filoktetes not allowed to vote) TUs voted, of which 16: yes 5: abstain

This means we have a quorum, and filoktetes is no longer a Trusted User.

I removed him from the trusted users wiki page. Please remove his cvs account, change his account on the forums etc. if you have the power to do so. Thanks.

As a sidenote, the following [community] packages become available (see the AUR webinterface for more information):

advancemame 0.106.0-3 advancemenu 2.4.13-4 advanceutils 0.106.0-1 aldrin 0.11-1 alexandria 0.6.1-5 denemo 0.7.6-1 diacanvas 0.14.4-1 elisa 0.3.2-1 gavl 0.2.5-1 gjots2 2.3.7-1 gnuconcept 0.3.5-1 kernel26eee 2.6.24-1 libquicktime 1.0.1-2 libzzub 0.2.3-1 lilypond 2.10.33-1 linux-uvc-svn 182-2 mhwaveedit 1.4.14-1 mlt++ 0.2.2-5 mlt-svn 1036-1 openmovieeditor 0.0.20071010-1 openoffice-nb 2.3.1rc1-2 openoffice-nn 2.3.1rc1-2 openoffice-spell-no 2.0.9-1 pigment 0.3.2-1 powertop 1.9-1 pyzzub 0.2.3-1 qtwvdialer 0.4.4-1 recoll 1.9.0-1 ruby-zoom 0.2.2-3 soundconverter 0.9.7-1 thoggen 0.6.0-2 treeline 1.0.2-1 ttf-mgopen 1.1-5 wlassistant 0.5.7-1 yaz 2.1.54-1

Please take some of these packages if you can. Thanks.

Ronald

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 08:45:58AM +0100, Ronald van Haren wrote:

I removed him from the trusted users wiki page. Please remove his cvs account, change his account on the forums etc. if you have the power to do so. Thanks.

done.

just a sidenote, any tu can take care of the aur account portion, which involves looking up a user and changing the type, as well as orphaning any of their community packages.

-S

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:14:09 +1000 Allan McRae mcrae_allan@hotmail.com wrote:

JJDaNiMoTh wrote:

...

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:45:58 +0100 "Ronald van Haren" pressh@gmail.com wrote:

...

advancemame 0.106.0-3 advancemenu 2.4.13-4 advanceutils 0.106.0-1

These are discontinued package, replaced by sdlmame ( already in community ). IMHO these packages should go in unsupported directly.

Well, do you want to add the replaces line to the sdlmame PKGBUILD first?

Replaced not in the 'maintainer' sense, there are different package, isn't a fork.

A lot of user has already switched long time ago.

Ronald van Haren wrote:

elisa 0.3.2-1 pigment 0.3.2-1

Adopted.

Bjørn

2008/3/15, BaSh bash.lnx@gmail.com:

2008/2/27, Ronald van Haren pressh@gmail.com:

...

kernel26eee 2.6.24-1

Adopted

I don't have adopted kernel26eee, toofishes has removed it because it was outdated/broken.

-- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User: #430842