Hi Everybody. I need some help, i'm the current mantainer of dosbox-cvs package and i have a problem. The source code of CVS repository isn't being mainteined recently, it's deprecated. Instead, the SVN repository is actually mantained for the devel team and for the moment the one.
I have no problem to update the PKGBUILD, but i need to change the name of the package because it won't be CVS anymore. Can any TU help me with that?
José Valecillos wrote:
Hi Everybody. I need some help, i'm the current mantainer of dosbox-cvs package and i have a problem. The source code of CVS repository isn't being mainteined recently, it's deprecated. Instead, the SVN repository is actually mantained for the devel team and for the moment the one.
I have no problem to update the PKGBUILD, but i need to change the name of the package because it won't be CVS anymore. Can any TU help me with that?
You should upload a new dosbox-svn package and then ask for the -cvs version to be deleted.
Allan
The few remaining packages in the two following bugs can no longer be built. Unless someone is able to provide patches to allow building them, I propose that they be moved to unsupported.
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13766 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9970
Daniel J Griffiths wrote:
The few remaining packages in the two following bugs can no longer be built. Unless someone is able to provide patches to allow building them, I propose that they be moved to unsupported.
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13766 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9970
+1 from me. None of those packages seem too popular.
Am Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:39:57 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae allan@archlinux.org:
Daniel J Griffiths wrote:
The few remaining packages in the two following bugs can no longer be built. Unless someone is able to provide patches to allow building them, I propose that they be moved to unsupported.
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13766 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9970
+1 from me. None of those packages seem too popular.
I don't think that fcron is so unpopular. See the discussions about cron in arch-dev-public and arch-general. It shouldn't be removed from [community].
Greetings, Heiko
Hi,
now that libjpeg 8-2 from [extra] has the static version included again, my AUR package libjpeg-static is no longer needed. It was just an interim solution to be able to compile fbsplash.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34273
Greetings, Heiko
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Heiko Baums lists@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Hi,
now that libjpeg 8-2 from [extra] has the static version included again, my AUR package libjpeg-static is no longer needed. It was just an interim solution to be able to compile fbsplash.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34273
Greetings, Heiko
Removed.
Am Sat, 6 Feb 2010 05:42:11 +0200 schrieb Evangelos Foutras foutrelis@gmail.com:
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Heiko Baums lists@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Hi,
now that libjpeg 8-2 from [extra] has the static version included again, my AUR package libjpeg-static is no longer needed. It was just an interim solution to be able to compile fbsplash.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34273
Greetings, Heiko
Removed.
Thanks.
2010/1/16 Daniel J Griffiths ghost1227@archlinux.us:
The few remaining packages in the two following bugs can no longer be built. Unless someone is able to provide patches to allow building them, I propose that they be moved to unsupported.
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13766 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9970
I agree too.
Ok, I lost my time, because x-daemon submit it before than i do, just hours before. The funny thing is that I had it already, just seeking to rename the package first.
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org