[aur-general] Change of Package Name - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

newer
[aur-general] Staff : can you...

[aur-general] Change of Package Name

older
Re: [aur-general]...

José Valecillos

16 Jan 2010 16 Jan '10

4:18 a.m.

Hi Everybody. I need some help, i'm the current mantainer of dosbox-cvs package and i have a problem. The source code of CVS repository isn't being mainteined recently, it's deprecated. Instead, the SVN repository is actually mantained for the devel team and for the moment the one. I have no problem to update the PKGBUILD, but i need to change the name of the package because it won't be CVS anymore. Can any TU help me with that? -- José Valecillos

Show replies by thread

Allan McRae

16 Jan 16 Jan

4:22 a.m.

José Valecillos wrote:

Hi Everybody. I need some help, i'm the current mantainer of dosbox-cvs package and i have a problem. The source code of CVS repository isn't being mainteined recently, it's deprecated. Instead, the SVN repository is actually mantained for the devel team and for the moment the one.

I have no problem to update the PKGBUILD, but i need to change the name of the package because it won't be CVS anymore. Can any TU help me with that?

You should upload a new dosbox-svn package and then ask for the -cvs version to be deleted. Allan

Daniel J Griffiths

6:33 a.m.

New subject: [aur-general] Packages to be removed from [community]

The few remaining packages in the two following bugs can no longer be built. Unless someone is able to provide patches to allow building them, I propose that they be moved to unsupported. http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13766 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9970

Allan McRae

6:39 a.m.

New subject: [aur-general] Packages to be removed from [community]

Daniel J Griffiths wrote:

The few remaining packages in the two following bugs can no longer be built. Unless someone is able to provide patches to allow building them, I propose that they be moved to unsupported.

http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13766 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9970

+1 from me. None of those packages seem too popular.

Andrea Scarpino

11:55 a.m.

New subject: [aur-general] Packages to be removed from [community]

2010/1/16 Daniel J Griffiths :

The few remaining packages in the two following bugs can no longer be built. Unless someone is able to provide patches to allow building them, I propose that they be moved to unsupported.

http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13766 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9970

I agree too. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Heiko Baums

1:58 p.m.

New subject: [aur-general] Packages to be removed from [community]

Am Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:39:57 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae :

Daniel J Griffiths wrote:

...
The few remaining packages in the two following bugs can no longer be built. Unless someone is able to provide patches to allow building them, I propose that they be moved to unsupported.

http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13766 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9970

+1 from me. None of those packages seem too popular.

I don't think that fcron is so unpopular. See the discussions about cron in arch-dev-public and arch-general. It shouldn't be removed from [community]. Greetings, Heiko

José Valecillos

8:57 p.m.

Ok, I lost my time, because x-daemon submit it before than i do, just hours before. The funny thing is that I had it already, just seeking to rename the package first. -- José Valecillos

Heiko Baums

6 Feb 6 Feb

3:34 a.m.

New subject: [aur-general] Package removal request: libjpeg-static

Hi, now that libjpeg 8-2 from [extra] has the static version included again, my AUR package libjpeg-static is no longer needed. It was just an interim solution to be able to compile fbsplash. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34273 Greetings, Heiko

Evangelos Foutras

3:42 a.m.

New subject: [aur-general] Package removal request: libjpeg-static

On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:

Hi,

now that libjpeg 8-2 from [extra] has the static version included again, my AUR package libjpeg-static is no longer needed. It was just an interim solution to be able to compile fbsplash.

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34273

Greetings, Heiko

Removed.

Heiko Baums

3:43 a.m.

New subject: [aur-general] Package removal request: libjpeg-static

Am Sat, 6 Feb 2010 05:42:11 +0200 schrieb Evangelos Foutras :

On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:

...
Hi,

now that libjpeg 8-2 from [extra] has the static version included again, my AUR package libjpeg-static is no longer needed. It was just an interim solution to be able to compile fbsplash.

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34273

Greetings, Heiko

Removed.

Thanks.

5192

Age (days ago)

5213

Last active (days ago)

Download

9 comments

6 participants

tags

participants (6)

Allan McRae
Andrea Scarpino
Daniel J Griffiths
Evangelos Foutras
Heiko Baums
José Valecillos