-----Alkuperäinen viesti----- Lähettäjä: David Spicer <azleifel@googlemail.com> Reply-to: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository \(AUR\)" <aur-general@archlinux.org> Vastaanottaja: Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) <aur-general@archlinux.org> Aihe: Re: [aur-general] Google-earth and bin32-google-earth Päiväys: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:09:45 +0100 I'm sitting here hoping that the current bin32- naming convention does not become deprecated, other than for some even better way of handling the situation where both 32-bit and 64-bit binaries are available and a package that installs the 32-bit binary on an x86_64 system is also useful. On 26/03/11 16:12, Pierre-Antoine Vanpe wrote:

I would also want to know about this for my utorrent package, They only provide a bin 32 binary but I decided to make only one package for both archs, should I create a bin32-utorrent-server package? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43253

I think that the bin32 and lib32 prefix should be used when the bin/lib32 can co exist with the non 32 package, just like the current lib32 packages are. Then the packaes, where upstream only provides 32 bit binary the package should be for both arches.