Excerpts from Peter Lewis's message of 2010-11-25 16:57:26 +0100:

On Thursday 25 November 2010 13:58:13 Joao Cordeiro wrote:

...

fftw2double http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6936

Same as fftw2 at community.

The AUR package uses the additional compiler flag --enable-threads. Does that do anything important here which might warrant it being kept as a separate pacakge?

Pete.

fftw-threads does the same and more, as far as I can see. The rezound maintainers should adapt their packages though. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30594

On Friday 26 November 2010 08:44:56 Philipp Überbacher wrote:

Excerpts from Peter Lewis's message of 2010-11-25 16:57:26 +0100:

...

On Thursday 25 November 2010 13:58:13 Joao Cordeiro wrote:

...

fftw2double http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6936

Same as fftw2 at community.

The AUR package uses the additional compiler flag --enable-threads. Does that do anything important here which might warrant it being kept as a separate pacakge?

Pete.

fftw-threads does the same and more, as far as I can see. The rezound maintainers should adapt their packages though. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30594

Well fftw-threads is version 3 and it seems that even the latest version of rezound still depends on version 2.x (they explicitly say not version 3 yet). The question is whether or not it can run with fftw2 from [community] or not. Pete.

Excerpts from Ray Rashif's message of 2010-11-26 12:31:57 +0100:

On 26 November 2010 18:23, Peter Lewis wrote:

...

On Friday 26 November 2010 08:44:56 Philipp Überbacher wrote:

...

Excerpts from Peter Lewis's message of 2010-11-25 16:57:26 +0100:

...

On Thursday 25 November 2010 13:58:13 Joao Cordeiro wrote:

...

fftw2double http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6936

Same as fftw2 at community.

The AUR package uses the additional compiler flag --enable-threads. Does that do anything important here which might warrant it being kept as a separate pacakge?

Pete.

fftw-threads does the same and more, as far as I can see. The rezound maintainers should adapt their packages though. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30594

Well fftw-threads is version 3 and it seems that even the latest version of rezound still depends on version 2.x (they explicitly say not version 3 yet). The question is whether or not it can run with fftw2 from [community] or not.

Confirmed. fftw2double needs to stay. It doesn't conflict with fftw2 anyway (different library name), and rezound depends on it exclusively. Rezound does not build against fftw2 or fftw(-threads).

Sorry, I missed the 2/3