Re: [aur-general] ruby 1.9.3_p125-1 in [extra]
As a result of the above change, all ruby gem packages will have to add a --no-user-install flag when running gem in the PKGBUILD.
Most PKGBUILDs specify -i/--install-dir and -n/--bindir. So there is no need to add --no-user-install, isn't it?
On 02/25/2012 11:24 PM, eagletmt wrote:
As a result of the above change, all ruby gem packages will have to add a --no-user-install flag when running gem in the PKGBUILD.
Most PKGBUILDs specify -i/--install-dir and -n/--bindir. So there is no need to add --no-user-install, isn't it?
You still need the --no-user-install option. It's not difficult to run makepkg without it =). You'll get a very small package and a bunch of stuff in ~/.gems.
2012年2月26日16:50 Matthew Monaco <dgbaley27@0x01b.net>:
On 02/25/2012 11:24 PM, eagletmt wrote:
As a result of the above change, all ruby gem packages will have to add a --no-user-install flag when running gem in the PKGBUILD.
Most PKGBUILDs specify -i/--install-dir and -n/--bindir. So there is no need to add --no-user-install, isn't it?
You still need the --no-user-install option. It's not difficult to run makepkg without it =). You'll get a very small package and a bunch of stuff in ~/.gems.
Ah, I get it now. Thank you.
participants (2)
-
eagletmt
-
Matthew Monaco