[aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request
Thanks for orphaning all of the packages. I'll go through them and figure out which ones are stale and can be deleted and which ones can be kept. I'll submit changes necessary in a single request rather than spamming the list with removal requests. Lucas
Actually, I do have another concern. The package mcabber-libotr4[1] is now superfluous. Under nixtrian, the mcabber-hg package did not enable libotr4 even though upstream has it in the code. My update to the PKGBUILD now adds libotr4 support by default (this follows the lead from mcabber in community). Should the mcabber-libotr4 package be removed? I hate to step on nkoehring's[2] toes, but it is the only package that user maintains[3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mcabber-libotr4/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/nkoehring [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=nkoehring&SeB=m Lucas On Wed, Feb 5, 2014, at 09:06 AM, tuftedocelot@fastmail.fm wrote:
Thanks for orphaning all of the packages. I'll go through them and figure out which ones are stale and can be deleted and which ones can be kept. I'll submit changes necessary in a single request rather than spamming the list with removal requests.
Lucas
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:21 PM, <tuftedocelot@fastmail.fm> wrote:
Actually, I do have another concern. The package mcabber-libotr4[1] is now superfluous. Under nixtrian, the mcabber-hg package did not enable libotr4 even though upstream has it in the code. My update to the PKGBUILD now adds libotr4 support by default (this follows the lead from mcabber in community). Should the mcabber-libotr4 package be removed? I hate to step on nkoehring's[2] toes, but it is the only package that user maintains[3].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mcabber-libotr4/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/nkoehring [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=nkoehring&SeB=m
Lucas
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014, at 09:06 AM, tuftedocelot@fastmail.fm wrote:
Thanks for orphaning all of the packages. I'll go through them and figure out which ones are stale and can be deleted and which ones can be kept. I'll submit changes necessary in a single request rather than spamming the list with removal requests.
Lucas
I'd leave mcabber-libotr4 for now as it is based on the stable release. It will be removed when mcabber in [community] switches to libotr4 though. -- Maxime
participants (2)
-
Maxime Gauduin
-
tuftedocelot＠fastmail.fm