[aur-general] Wrong username in disown notification
Hey, I just added blueyed as a co-maintainer for the rxvt-unicode-patched package and then disowned it (transferring the ownership to him). This sent me a wrong mail: The package rxvt-unicode-patched [1] was disowned by blueyed [2]. I hope this is the right place for bug reports like this, as Arch's flyspray doesn't really have anything specific enough for AUR bugs. Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | me@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/
On 12/20/2016 11:58 PM, Florian Bruhin wrote:
Go report a bug on Arch's flyspray, under the "AUR web interface" project. Which does, in fact, actually exist. https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2 -- Eli Schwartz
* Doug Newgard <scimmia@archlinux.info> [2016-12-20 23:13:47 -0600]:
There is a specific project for the AUR in flyspray, upper left hand corner.
* Eli Schwartz via aur-general <aur-general@archlinux.org> [2016-12-21 00:05:43 -0500]:
Huh. I haven't had my first coffee yet, but when I open a bug I can only select a category, with the most accurate ones being "web sites" and "Arch projects" - both of which seemed kinda unspecific for an AUR mail bug. Am I missing something? Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | me@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/
On 12/21/2016 12:27 AM, Florian Bruhin wrote:
You must be, because if you *follow my link* and open a bug report against the "AUR web interface" project, the default category is "Backend", and your alternatives are "PKGBUILD Parser" and "Security". So go drink that coffee and look again, I guess? ... Flyspray has "projects", which are essentially different bugtrackers. Switch between them with the Switch button next to "the" dropdown. Or, well, follow the link which I gave you for a reason! -- Eli Schwartz
* Eli Schwartz via aur-general <aur-general@archlinux.org> [2016-12-21 00:50:12 -0500]:
I saw that dropdown now - guess that coffee helped :D Reported here: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/52225
If you're not aware of different projects being a thing, the possibility of getting a different bug report form after following a link to a list of bugs doesn't really come to mind ;) Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | me@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/
On 12/21/2016 01:22 AM, Florian Bruhin wrote:
Well... it is a bit strange. But Flyspray, warts and all, is what we are stuck with until this bug gets some kind of resolution: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24999 Spoiler: Flyspray is undermaintained and Bugzilla is the new hotness, but everyone is so used to dealing with Flyspray anyway that nobody really got around to migrating, even though most people seem to agree it would probably be a good idea. -- Eli Schwartz
Den 21-12-2016 kl. 07:34 skrev Eli Schwartz via aur-general:
Bugzilla is the new hotness,
For some definition of "new", I guess. 😏 (Bugzilla being 18 years old now (unknown version, 1998-08-26), and Flyspray's earliest release (that I can find) is from 9 years ago (0.9.9.3, 2007-08-23).) -- Namasté, Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen <https://freso.dk/> AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Freso
On 12/21/2016 10:46 AM, Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen via aur-general wrote:
The hotness, not Bugzilla itself. Taste in bugtrackers is clearly a very fickle thing. ;) Why, some people seem to think GitHub Issues are the new hotness in bugtrackers... -- Eli Schwartz
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 05:58:20 +0100 Florian Bruhin <me@the-compiler.org> wrote:
There is a specific project for the AUR in flyspray, upper left hand corner.
participants (4)
-
Doug Newgard
-
Eli Schwartz
-
Florian Bruhin
-
Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen