Yes, wxpython-devel would be even better. Oh, i didn't know that. I'll upload the new package. 2013/10/24 Doug Newgard

----------------------------------------

...

Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:43:51 -0400 From: jdarnold@buddydog.org To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] Removal/Renaming Request

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:18:18 -0002 Ronnie Andrew wrote:

...

I'm the new maintainer of the package: wxpython https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython-2.4.9.1/

This package should be renamed from "wxpython-2.4.9.1" to "wxpython-updates" since its the development version of wxpython and submitting a new package for each version would not be ideal.

Also, i mistakenly submitted a new package trying to update wxpython to a new version which should be deleted. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython2.9.5.0/

Actually, there already is a wxpython in extra that does all this. It should be marked out of date, I would think.

-- Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io

If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you need a team ~ John Wooden

No, the package in extra is the stable version, the AUR one is the unstable development version.

IMO, it should be wxpython-devel to keep with the accepted naming scheme.

Ronnie, you need to upload the new package to the AUR then a TU can merge the old package into it. They cannot rename a package.

-- *Ronnie Andrew* *Tecnologia em Análise e Desenvolvimento de Sistemas* *UNICAMP - FT*

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Ronnie Andrew Magatti Lucas Silva < ronnieandrew92@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10/24/2013 03:47 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:

----------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:43:51 -0400 From: jdarnold@buddydog.org To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] Removal/Renaming Request

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:18:18 -0002 Ronnie Andrew wrote:

I'm the new maintainer of the package: wxpythonhttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython-2.4.9.1/

This package should be renamed from "wxpython-2.4.9.1" to "wxpython-updates" since its the development version of wxpython and submitting a new package for each version would not be ideal.

Also, i mistakenly submitted a new package trying to update wxpython to a new version which should be deleted.https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython2.9.5.0/

Actually, there already is a wxpython in extra that does all this. It should be marked out of date, I would think.

-- Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io

If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you need a team ~ John Wooden

No, the package in extra is the stable version, the AUR one is the unstable development version.

IMO, it should be wxpython-devel to keep with the accepted naming scheme.

Ronnie, you need to upload the new package to the AUR then a TU can merge the old package into it. They cannot rename a package.

I've submitted the new package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython-devel/

Please merge it with wxpython-2.4.9.1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython-2.4.9.1/

Also, the following package sould be removed since I mistakenly uploaded it: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython2.9.5.0/

Done, thx. -- Maxime