I'm not sure about this comment [0], it should likely be moderated simply for being overly complex. I think it's silly not to use a pastebin or even open a new package with the proposed updates temporarily, so everyone could benefit from the changes immediately. That said, I actually wonder whether the content can even be applied as a patch due to possible whitespace mangling.
cheers! mar77i
[0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ovmf-git#comment-523938
On 07/12, Martti Kühne wrote:
I'm not sure about this comment [0], it should likely be moderated simply for being overly complex. I think it's silly not to use a pastebin or even open a new package with the proposed updates temporarily, so everyone could benefit from the changes immediately. That said, I actually wonder whether the content can even be applied as a patch due to possible whitespace mangling.
Duplicate packages aren't allowed, but they definitely should have used either a pastebin or something like GitHub.
On 07/12, Martti Kühne wrote:
I'm not sure about this comment [0], it should likely be moderated simply for being overly complex. I think it's silly not to use a pastebin or even open a new package with the proposed updates temporarily, so everyone could benefit from the changes immediately. That said, I actually wonder whether the content can even be applied as a patch due to possible whitespace mangling.
Duplicate packages aren't allowed, but they definitely should have used either a pastebin or something like GitHub.
I have pastebinned the original content and replaced it in the comment with a link.
For anyone who missed it, was was a huge sprawling wall of code and text that required a 3-day journey to get to the previous comments. Storing it in the AUR database increased global temperature by 0.0035 C.
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org