Hi TUs, I want to see who is working and who is not. These TUs are flagged as active but they did nothing in the last 4-6 months. What do you think about? Should we start with removal vote?
Kessia Pinheiro aka even: - last package sent on 20th March '09 - last closed bug on 13th April '09 - last post on bbs 18th April '09
Aaron Schaefer aka elasticdog: - last package sent on 14th June '09 - last closed bug on 22th April '09 - last post on bbs 19th March '09
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Andrea Scarpino andrea@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi TUs, I want to see who is working and who is not. These TUs are flagged as active but they did nothing in the last 4-6 months. What do you think about? Should we start with removal vote?
Kessia Pinheiro aka even:
- last package sent on 20th March '09
- last closed bug on 13th April '09
- last post on bbs 18th April '09
Aaron Schaefer aka elasticdog:
- last package sent on 14th June '09
- last closed bug on 22th April '09
- last post on bbs 19th March '09
-- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
Sorry Andrea, I'm not a TU but as I know, Kessia did some activity, orphaning packages e.g. since then.
Best Regards, Laszlo Papp
On Sat 31 Oct 2009 23:11 +0100, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Hi TUs, I want to see who is working and who is not. These TUs are flagged as active but they did nothing in the last 4-6 months. What do you think about? Should we start with removal vote?
Kessia Pinheiro aka even:
- last package sent on 20th March '09
- last closed bug on 13th April '09
- last post on bbs 18th April '09
Aaron Schaefer aka elasticdog:
- last package sent on 14th June '09
- last closed bug on 22th April '09
- last post on bbs 19th March '09
How about mailing list posts?
On 01/11/2009, Loui Chang louipc.ist@gmail.com wrote:
How about mailing list posts?
even sent her last message on 24th September, elasticdog 2 weeks ago. I believe they will read this message soon and will explain us the situation.
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Hi TUs, I want to see who is working and who is not. These TUs are flagged as active but they did nothing in the last 4-6 months. What do you think about? Should we start with removal vote?
-1. There's only one condition under which I'd vote to remove somebody: *intentional harm* to the distro.
But FWIW, Elasticdog recently sent a post to the ML stating that he was inactive.
-- Chris
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Chris Brannon cmbrannon79@gmail.com wrote:
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Hi TUs, I want to see who is working and who is not. These TUs are flagged as active but they did nothing in the last 4-6 months. What do you think about? Should we start with removal vote?
-1. There's only one condition under which I'd vote to remove somebody: *intentional harm* to the distro.
But FWIW, Elasticdog recently sent a post to the ML stating that he was inactive.
-- Chris
They voted in the SVP process, maybe they are not active at all but they aren't inactive IMO (sometimes the real life stuff push too much than usually, in my experience)
On 01/11/2009, Chris Brannon cmbrannon79@gmail.com wrote:
-1. There's only one condition under which I'd vote to remove somebody: *intentional harm* to the distro.
But FWIW, Elasticdog recently sent a post to the ML stating that he was inactive.
No problem if they are inactive. Everyone can be busy. But they should flagged theirself as inactive. We have a TU Bylaws[1] that speak up.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Andrea Scarpino andrea@archlinux.org wrote:
On 01/11/2009, Chris Brannon cmbrannon79@gmail.com wrote:
-1. There's only one condition under which I'd vote to remove somebody: *intentional harm* to the distro.
But FWIW, Elasticdog recently sent a post to the ML stating that he was inactive.
No problem if they are inactive. Everyone can be busy. But they should flagged theirself as inactive. We have a TU Bylaws[1] that speak up.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html
-- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-May/004850.html
On 01/11/2009, Laszlo Papp djszapi@archlinux.us wrote:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-May/004850.html
Well, this message was sent 5 months ago and I do not know what we must do now. Anyway someone must remember her to update Trusted Users page[1] next time.
[1] http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Trusted_Users
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Andrea Scarpino andrea@archlinux.org wrote:
On 01/11/2009, Laszlo Papp djszapi@archlinux.us wrote:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-May/004850.html
Well, this message was sent 5 months ago and I do not know what we must do now. Anyway someone must remember her to update Trusted Users page[1] next time.
[1] http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Trusted_Users
-- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer
Yeah, I agree with you like You, Bardo and others did it in the past
Would it better to sign it on the http://archlinux.org/developers page ?
Best Regards, Laszlo Papp
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Andrea Scarpino andrea@archlinux.org wrote:
Aaron Schaefer aka elasticdog:
- last package sent on 14th June '09
- last closed bug on 22th April '09
- last post on bbs 19th March '09
I am around, but had hardware issues a while back and am in the process of getting a new x86_64 machine set up for building (I sent a message to the list)...I *am* following the mailing lists and participating in votes, etc., so I'm only half-inactive. I don't visit the forums too often right now, but can always be found on IRC (just not since a few weeks ago when the hardware stuff came up).
On my old machine, I had tried to update some of my packages since the move to SVN, but was receiving odd errors from Gerold that I never got sorted out. Once my hardware issues came up, I figured I'd get things going again on the new setup, and other people have generously filled in and rebuilt my out of date stuff. I still have vim-rails to update and I do have a bug report on my jgnash package that has been split into two versions upstream, so I'll figure out how to best handle that soon.
I do apologize for the lack of activity, but this summer has been extremely busy for me personally (graduated, moved to a new state, bought a house, got married, started a new job with an hour commute, had two close friends pass away, etc.). Anyway, I'll try to get back up and running this weekend as my new hardware is in, and I'll post back for help if I'm still experiencing issues as I was before.
-- Aaron "ElasticDog" Schaefer
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Aaron Schaefer aaron@elasticdog.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Andrea Scarpino andrea@archlinux.org wrote:
Aaron Schaefer aka elasticdog:
- last package sent on 14th June '09
- last closed bug on 22th April '09
- last post on bbs 19th March '09
I am around, but had hardware issues a while back and am in the process of getting a new x86_64 machine set up for building (I sent a message to the list)...I *am* following the mailing lists and participating in votes, etc., so I'm only half-inactive. I don't visit the forums too often right now, but can always be found on IRC (just not since a few weeks ago when the hardware stuff came up).
On my old machine, I had tried to update some of my packages since the move to SVN, but was receiving odd errors from Gerold that I never got sorted out. Once my hardware issues came up, I figured I'd get things going again on the new setup, and other people have generously filled in and rebuilt my out of date stuff. I still have vim-rails to update and I do have a bug report on my jgnash package that has been split into two versions upstream, so I'll figure out how to best handle that soon.
I do apologize for the lack of activity, but this summer has been extremely busy for me personally (graduated, moved to a new state, bought a house, got married, started a new job with an hour commute, had two close friends pass away, etc.). Anyway, I'll try to get back up and running this weekend as my new hardware is in, and I'll post back for help if I'm still experiencing issues as I was before.
-- Aaron "ElasticDog" Schaefer
As I said, isn't always easy to handle the real life, no problem for me, if you can't contribute anymore, just told us, but if you have thought in come back, then just mark yourself as away on the wiki.
I hope you're OK.
Btw, I wrote even (since I was her sponsor) asking what's happening? and if she will come back with us, I know Kessia is a responsible girl, so I am getting worried about her, I am waiting for the answer.
Cheers
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Aaron Schaefer aaron@elasticdog.com wrote:
I do apologize for the lack of activity, but this summer has been extremely busy for me personally (graduated, moved to a new state, bought a house, got married, started a new job with an hour commute, had two close friends pass away, etc.). Anyway, I'll try to get back up and running this weekend as my new hardware is in, and I'll post back for help if I'm still experiencing issues as I was before.
Congratulation for your marriage and the new home!!
As angvp said if you are inactive or busy just told us. We can fix your packages if you are flagged as inactive and now we know why you aren't working.
On 02/11/2009, Angel Velásquez angvp@archlinux.com.ve wrote:
Btw, I wrote even (since I was her sponsor) asking what's happening? and if she will come back with us, I know Kessia is a responsible girl, so I am getting worried about her, I am waiting for the answer.
Let us know.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Andrea Scarpino andrea@archlinux.org wrote:
Congratulation for your marriage and the new home!!
Thanks!
As angvp said if you are inactive or busy just told us. We can fix your packages if you are flagged as inactive and now we know why you aren't working.
After I ordered the new machine I sent http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-October/006919.html and was in touch with Chris Brannon (cmb) who rebuilt some stuff for me, so I don't think there's anything too urgent pending for me. I will make sure to update the wiki page next time I can't build...
-- Aaron "ElasticDog" Schaefer
Sorry guys for the away time. I was traveling for until today and i dont had any connection there.
I was inactive for months because many personal problems and i'm trying fix them for a complete return weeks ago. In few days i'll back to work. I spoke with angvp last week and with thotypous some time ago about that, and i'm back in aur moves already, fixing my packages and testing anothers (i'll upload them fixed soon). So, please don't remove me. :)
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Aaron Schaefer aaron@elasticdog.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Andrea Scarpino andrea@archlinux.org wrote:
Congratulation for your marriage and the new home!!
Thanks!
As angvp said if you are inactive or busy just told us. We can fix your packages if you are flagged as inactive and now we know why you aren't working.
After I ordered the new machine I sent http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-October/006919.html and was in touch with Chris Brannon (cmb) who rebuilt some stuff for me, so I don't think there's anything too urgent pending for me. I will make sure to update the wiki page next time I can't build...
-- Aaron "ElasticDog" Schaefer
On 03/11/2009, Kessia 'even' Pinheiro kessiapinheiro@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry guys for the away time. I was traveling for until today and i dont had any connection there.
I was inactive for months because many personal problems and i'm trying fix them for a complete return weeks ago. In few days i'll back to work. I spoke with angvp last week and with thotypous some time ago about that, and i'm back in aur moves already, fixing my packages and testing anothers (i'll upload them fixed soon). So, please don't remove me. :)
It's ok, but remember to put yourself in Inactive list next time ;)
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org