[aur-general] Delete request - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

newer
[aur-general] Please delete...

[aur-general] Delete request

older
[aur-general] RM a bunch of...

Wanton

30 Nov 2010 30 Nov '10

8:32 p.m.

bin32-zsnes http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19167 Already in multilib. rocksndiamonds-fedora https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22418 Outdated, replaced by community/rocksndiamonds. dune2 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33037 Broken link, and this is non-free game. mahjongforunix http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22225 Already in extra with name mahjong. Regards, Wanton.

Show replies by date

Seblu

30 Nov 30 Nov

10:51 p.m.

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Wanton wrote:

bin32-zsnes http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19167 Already in multilib.

rocksndiamonds-fedora https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22418 Outdated, replaced by community/rocksndiamonds.

dune2 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33037 Broken link, and this is non-free game.

In a general way, non-free game/soft is a valid argument? -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

PyroPeter

11:11 p.m.

On 11/30/2010 11:51 PM, Seblu wrote:

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Wanton wrote:

...
bin32-zsnes http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19167 Already in multilib.

rocksndiamonds-fedora https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22418 Outdated, replaced by community/rocksndiamonds.

dune2 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33037 Broken link, and this is non-free game.

In a general way, non-free game/soft is a valid argument?

No. Afaik even the official repositorys contain non-free software. -- freenode/pyropeter "12:50 - Ich drücke Return."

Sven-Hendrik Haase

1 Dec 1 Dec

5 a.m.

On 01.12.2010 00:11, PyroPeter wrote:

On 11/30/2010 11:51 PM, Seblu wrote:

...
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Wanton wrote:

...
bin32-zsnes http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19167 Already in multilib.

rocksndiamonds-fedora https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22418 Outdated, replaced by community/rocksndiamonds.

dune2 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33037 Broken link, and this is non-free game.

In a general way, non-free game/soft is a valid argument?

No. Afaik even the official repositorys contain non-free software.

Indeed, rms wouldn't be happy. Anyhow, if end up discussing the ethics of non-free software we'll end up like Debian. Let's just let our users choose what they want to use as long as providing the software isn't illegal. Just fix the broken link or orphan the package and let somebody else take over. -- Sven-Hendrik

Ng Oon-Ee

6:01 a.m.

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 06:00 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:

On 01.12.2010 00:11, PyroPeter wrote:

...
On 11/30/2010 11:51 PM, Seblu wrote:

...
...
dune2 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33037 Broken link, and this is non-free game.

In a general way, non-free game/soft is a valid argument?

No. Afaik even the official repositorys contain non-free software.

Indeed, rms wouldn't be happy. Anyhow, if end up discussing the ethics of non-free software we'll end up like Debian. Let's just let our users choose what they want to use as long as providing the software isn't illegal.

Just to play devil's advocate, illegal according to which jurisdiction =)

Cédric Girard

9:56 a.m.

2010/12/1 Ng Oon-Ee

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 06:00 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:

...
On 01.12.2010 00:11, PyroPeter wrote:

...
On 11/30/2010 11:51 PM, Seblu wrote:

...
...
dune2 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33037 Broken link, and this is non-free game.

In a general way, non-free game/soft is a valid argument?

No. Afaik even the official repositorys contain non-free software.

Indeed, rms wouldn't be happy. Anyhow, if end up discussing the ethics of non-free software we'll end up like Debian. Let's just let our users choose what they want to use as long as providing the software isn't illegal.

Just to play devil's advocate, illegal according to which jurisdiction =)

Some things are for sure not legal in any jurisdiction... -- Cédric Girard

wanton clarion

11:08 a.m.

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:

On 01.12.2010 00:11, PyroPeter wrote:

...
On 11/30/2010 11:51 PM, Seblu wrote:

...
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Wanton wrote:

...
bin32-zsnes http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19167 Already in multilib.

rocksndiamonds-fedora https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22418 Outdated, replaced by community/rocksndiamonds.

dune2 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33037 Broken link, and this is non-free game.

In a general way, non-free game/soft is a valid argument?

No. Afaik even the official repositorys contain non-free software.

Indeed, rms wouldn't be happy. Anyhow, if end up discussing the ethics of non-free software we'll end up like Debian. Let's just let our users choose what they want to use as long as providing the software isn't illegal.

Just fix the broken link or orphan the package and let somebody else take over.

-- Sven-Hendrik

Fix: as i know, its a commercial game.

Alexander Rødseth

4:23 p.m.

I don't think this package belongs in AUR either, it should be in a separate pirate-repository. ;) --- Alexander Rødseth

Cédric Girard

4:32 p.m.

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:

I don't think this package belongs in AUR either, it should be in a separate pirate-repository. ;)

--- Alexander Rødseth

This is a game from 1992. It is present on many abandonware websites. But the status of abandonware is not a real legit status... -- Cédric Girard

4896

Age (days ago)

4897

Last active (days ago)

Download

8 comments

8 participants

tags

participants (8)

Alexander Rødseth
Cédric Girard
Ng Oon-Ee
PyroPeter
Seblu
Sven-Hendrik Haase
Wanton
wanton clarion