[aur-general] Orphan request: perl-cpan-meta-check
Hey, please orphan perl-cpan-meta-check[1] as I would like to take over maintainership. Some of my own packages require the new version of the Perl package provided by $subject; therefore the lack of an update is holding me back. I've flagged it as being out-of-date on 2013-09-13. I've added a comment about this on 2013-09-19, and I've emailed the maintainer on 2013-09-26. I have yet to receive a single sign of life from him. Several of his other packages[2] are flagged as out-of-date as well, but I'm only interested in maintaining the one in $subject at this moment. Thanks for considering. Kind regards, mosu [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpan-meta-check/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=dseg&SeB=m
On 10/12/2013 02:19 PM, Moritz Bunkus wrote:
Hey,
please orphan perl-cpan-meta-check[1] as I would like to take over maintainership. Some of my own packages require the new version of the Perl package provided by $subject; therefore the lack of an update is holding me back.
I've flagged it as being out-of-date on 2013-09-13. I've added a comment about this on 2013-09-19, and I've emailed the maintainer on 2013-09-26. I have yet to receive a single sign of life from him. Several of his other packages[2] are flagged as out-of-date as well, but I'm only interested in maintaining the one in $subject at this moment.
Thanks for considering.
Kind regards, mosu
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpan-meta-check/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=dseg&SeB=m
Orphaned, thank you. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/
On 10/13/13 04:28, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
On 10/12/2013 02:19 PM, Moritz Bunkus wrote:
Orphaned, thank you.
Gee, that's funny, I never remember seeing any emails about this pkg... While I'm not exactly the quickest responder on Out Of Date replies, well legitimate the upstream version is newer than the PKBUILD version, Out of Date replies anyways; I do go through an update all my OODs a cpl times a month.... Now, there is the possibility that this was not my PKGBUILD (I own 729, mostly perl packages), but I'd sure like to have it reviewed who this maintainer was, and if it's me... why I've not received any emailings with regard... -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1972@gmail.com jnbek1972@gmail.com http://zoelife4u.org/
http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/perl-cpan-meta-check/PKGBUILD?... Maintainer was listed as Alan Young until the current maintainer took over. So unless you had it but never put your name on it, it wasn't yours. ----------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:37:49 -0600 From: unixgeek1972@gmail.com To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: perl-cpan-meta-check
On 10/13/13 04:28, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
On 10/12/2013 02:19 PM, Moritz Bunkus wrote:
Orphaned, thank you.
Gee, that's funny, I never remember seeing any emails about this pkg... While I'm not exactly the quickest responder on Out Of Date replies, well legitimate the upstream version is newer than the PKBUILD version, Out of Date replies anyways; I do go through an update all my OODs a cpl times a month.... Now, there is the possibility that this was not my PKGBUILD (I own 729, mostly perl packages), but I'd sure like to have it reviewed who this maintainer was, and if it's me... why I've not received any emailings with regard...
-- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1972@gmail.com jnbek1972@gmail.com http://zoelife4u.org/
El 14/10/13 20:37, John D Jones III escribió:
Gee, that's funny, I never remember seeing any emails about this pkg... While I'm not exactly the quickest responder on Out Of Date replies, well legitimate the upstream version is newer than the PKBUILD version, Out of Date replies anyways; I do go through an update all my OODs a cpl times a month.... Now, there is the possibility that this was not my PKGBUILD (I own 729, mostly perl packages), but I'd sure like to have it reviewed who this maintainer was, and if it's me... why I've not received any emailings with regard...
The maintainer was 'dseg' according to the second footnote in the first mail.
On 10/14/13 17:49, v1c70r wrote:
El 14/10/13 20:37, John D Jones III escribió: The maintainer was 'dseg' according to the second footnote in the first mail.
OK thanks.... I got confused as I do have a package very similarly named that is OOD; also, I know Alan/harleypig and adopted what I thought was all his packages when he left them. Sorry for any presumptions, but I just wanted to make 100% sure I didn't let anything fall through the cracks. -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1972@gmail.com jnbek1972@gmail.com http://zoelife4u.org/
participants (5)
-
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
-
Doug Newgard
-
John D Jones III
-
Moritz Bunkus
-
v1c70r