On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Daniel J Griffiths wrote:

Ray Kohler wrote:

...

For a while now, I've been adopting packages that I'm not actually interested in, and in some cases don't really even understand, just because I have the time to help out and want to be a nice guy. I'm having second thoughts about the wisdom of this. Should I orphan these packages, on the off-chance that somebody more appropriate wants to own them? Is a mediocre maintainer better than no maintainer?

If you feel the need to abandon a package or two, feel free to let us know... someone will probably be happy to take them off your hands. :P

Ok, I've orphaned the following packages, which are ether difficult in some way for me, or for which I would be unable to support any problems users may find: dvdwizard eclim festival-hts-voices ffmpeg-pspvc go-oo-bin-base krb5-crypto lib32-freeglut lib32-gmp lib32-jdk lib32-libasyncns lib32-libcap lib32-libopenssl2 lib32-libsasl lib32-libvorbis lib32-libxp lib32-pulseaudio lib32-xulrunner libcapi20 libtorrent-unstable megamario nspluginwrapper-ubuntu paq8 poco qtjambi shrip sysbench task veusz vilefault virtualbox_bin_additions x264-pspvc

Jaime Oyarzun Knittel wrote:

Ray Kohler wrote: [...]

...

virtualbox_bin_additions

Adopted. I use virtualbox a lot, so I hope I can be a good mantainer/tester :)

Adopted dvdwizard, no need to let it go around by itself :p and more pkgs for me lol. also cleaned it up as well, needed it

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Tomás Acauan Schertel wrote:

I was waiting for these:

ffmpeg-pspvc x264-pspvc pspvc

I heard a rumor that "normal" ffmpeg and x264 are now sufficient for this purpose, and that's why pspvc hasn't been updated for such a long time. It's also why I didn't feel motivated to maintain them - I didn't know if anyone was still using them much any longer.

Ray Kohler wrote:

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Daniel J Griffiths wrote:

...

Ray Kohler wrote:

...

For a while now, I've been adopting packages that I'm not actually interested in, and in some cases don't really even understand, just because I have the time to help out and want to be a nice guy. I'm having second thoughts about the wisdom of this. Should I orphan these packages, on the off-chance that somebody more appropriate wants to own them? Is a mediocre maintainer better than no maintainer?

If you feel the need to abandon a package or two, feel free to let us know... someone will probably be happy to take them off your hands. :P

Ok, I've orphaned the following packages, which are ether difficult in some way for me, or for which I would be unable to support any problems users may find:

dvdwizard eclim festival-hts-voices ffmpeg-pspvc go-oo-bin-base krb5-crypto lib32-freeglut lib32-gmp lib32-jdk lib32-libasyncns lib32-libcap lib32-libopenssl2 lib32-libsasl lib32-libvorbis lib32-libxp lib32-pulseaudio lib32-xulrunner libcapi20 libtorrent-unstable megamario nspluginwrapper-ubuntu paq8 poco qtjambi shrip sysbench task veusz vilefault virtualbox_bin_additions x264-pspvc

Took sysbench and shrip -- Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) griffithsdj@archlinux.us http://ghost1227.com