On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Christian Scharkus <mail.sensenmann@googlemail.com> wrote:

Hi

I just looked for some package containing the latest beta of the amarok music player but there are two packages containing beta3 (amarok2 and amarok-beta3). May the question is childish but: why two packages with the very same content? It just puzzles beginners. Ofcause for archivement are packages like amarok-beta2 and amarok-beta3 useful but only few users use old beta-software and it messes arround in AUR in my eyes.

Greetings Raubkopierer

I'm not sure which one to delete, I dislike both namings. IMO a name like amarok-unstable or amarok-devel would fit it better. At least the beta3 name is plain stupid as there is also a beta2 etc... I'll see if I can contact both maintainers this evening and remove the old packages sometime after that. Ronald