[aur-general] Request to merge eclipse-382 and eclipse-38
Hello, Eclipse 3.8.2 is released months ago, but the package eclipse-38 still remains in 3.8.0. No response from the maintainer. Hence I created the package eclipse-382 . Could someone merge eclipse-382 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-382 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-vimwiki-hg/> into eclipse-38 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-38 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-vimwiki-git/> ? What's more, I am ready to take responsibility for maintaining this package. Could someone do me a favour, disown the package for me? Thanks, Fernando Gilbertinho
Den 17-10-2013 06:00, Fernando Gilberto da Silva skrev:
No response from the maintainer.
How did you try to contact them? How long have you been waiting for a response? Note the 3rd point at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Other_requests
Could someone merge
eclipse-382 [...] into eclipse-38 [...] ?
You realise that by merging -382 into -38 (which I agree should happen), the PKGBUILD from -38 is the one that's going to take precedence, right? You'll need to reupload your package (named as -38) for the -38 package to actually be updated. Of course, you need to be the maintainer of the package, which you've already requested. :)
What's more, I am ready to take responsibility for maintaining this package. Could someone do me a favour, disown the package for me?
See the first part of the response. -- Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen <http://freso.dk/>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen <freso.dk@gmail.com> wrote:
Den 17-10-2013 06:00, Fernando Gilberto da Silva skrev:
No response from the maintainer.
How did you try to contact them? How long have you been waiting for a response? Note the 3rd point at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Other_requests
Could someone merge
eclipse-382 [...] into eclipse-38 [...] ?
You realise that by merging -382 into -38 (which I agree should happen), the PKGBUILD from -38 is the one that's going to take precedence, right? You'll need to reupload your package (named as -38) for the -38 package to actually be updated. Of course, you need to be the maintainer of the package, which you've already requested. :)
What's more, I am ready to take responsibility for maintaining this package. Could someone do me a favour, disown the package for me?
See the first part of the response.
-- Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen <http://freso.dk/>
Please upload a eclipse3.8 package, so it follows the naming scheme found in our repos for different versions of an existing package. Then I'll merge eclipse-38 and and eclipse-382 into it. BTW, eclipse-38 is already an orphan. Cheers, -- Maxime
Hello everyone, Finally I adopted eclipse-38 and eclipse-juno(Which is actually 3.8) and uploaded package eclipse3.8. Could someone do me a favour, merge the following eclipse-382 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-382 eclipse-38 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-38 eclipse-juno https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-juno into eclipse3.8 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse3.8 ? Thanks, Fernando Gilbertinho 2013/10/18 Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com>:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen <freso.dk@gmail.com> wrote:
Den 17-10-2013 06:00, Fernando Gilberto da Silva skrev:
No response from the maintainer.
How did you try to contact them? How long have you been waiting for a response? Note the 3rd point at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Other_requests
Could someone merge
eclipse-382 [...] into eclipse-38 [...] ?
You realise that by merging -382 into -38 (which I agree should happen), the PKGBUILD from -38 is the one that's going to take precedence, right? You'll need to reupload your package (named as -38) for the -38 package to actually be updated. Of course, you need to be the maintainer of the package, which you've already requested. :)
What's more, I am ready to take responsibility for maintaining this package. Could someone do me a favour, disown the package for me?
See the first part of the response.
-- Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen <http://freso.dk/>
Please upload a eclipse3.8 package, so it follows the naming scheme found in our repos for different versions of an existing package. Then I'll merge eclipse-38 and and eclipse-382 into it. BTW, eclipse-38 is already an orphan.
Cheers, -- Maxime
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Fernando Gilberto da Silva <firefgx@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello everyone,
Finally I adopted eclipse-38 and eclipse-juno(Which is actually 3.8) and uploaded package eclipse3.8.
Could someone do me a favour, merge the following
eclipse-382 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-382 eclipse-38 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-38 eclipse-juno https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-juno
into
eclipse3.8 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse3.8 ?
Thanks,
Fernando Gilbertinho
2013/10/18 Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com>:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen <freso.dk@gmail.com> wrote:
Den 17-10-2013 06:00, Fernando Gilberto da Silva skrev:
No response from the maintainer.
How did you try to contact them? How long have you been waiting for a response? Note the 3rd point at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Other_requests
Could someone merge
eclipse-382 [...] into eclipse-38 [...] ?
You realise that by merging -382 into -38 (which I agree should happen), the PKGBUILD from -38 is the one that's going to take precedence, right? You'll need to reupload your package (named as -38) for the -38 package to actually be updated. Of course, you need to be the maintainer of the package, which you've already requested. :)
What's more, I am ready to take responsibility for maintaining this package. Could someone do me a favour, disown the package for me?
See the first part of the response.
-- Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen <http://freso.dk/>
Please upload a eclipse3.8 package, so it follows the naming scheme found in our repos for different versions of an existing package. Then I'll merge eclipse-38 and and eclipse-382 into it. BTW, eclipse-38 is already an orphan.
Cheers, -- Maxime
All done, thx. -- Maxime
participants (3)
-
Fernando Gilberto da Silva
-
Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen
-
Maxime Gauduin