[aur-general] [Deletion request] cl-asdf-install
[cl-asdf-install][1] is now included by default in the [cl-asdf][2] package, so there's not much of a need for this package to hang around. I made a note on the cl-asdf-install page a while back that the package has been absorbed by cl-asdf; I figure enough time has passed for users to have upgraded cl-asdf and switched over. [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18801 [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18800 Anyway, thanks! Ivy
[cl-asdf-install][1] is now included by default in the [cl-asdf][2] package,
'tis a goner, as of now. -- Chris
joyfulgirl <joyfulgirl@archlinux.us> wrote:
Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79@gmail.com> wrote:
'tis a goner, as of now.
Great, thanks!
Ok, here's a stupid question that occurred to me as I was deleting that package. Shouldn't cl-asdf really be part of clisp? I mean, asdf is pretty much a prerequisite, if you are doing any sort of serious Lisping. What is the deal? Is it licensing? -- Chris
Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79@gmail.com> wrote:
Shouldn't cl-asdf really be part of clisp? I mean, asdf is pretty much a prerequisite, if you are doing any sort of serious Lisping. What is the deal? Is it licensing?
Y'know, I don't know the history. Licensing sounds promising (asdf is under an MIT-style license, clisp is GNU). Luckily, it's pretty easy to install asdf (-:
participants (3)
-
Chris Brannon
-
Ivy Foster
-
joyfulgirl