On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 11:29:04 +0200 Christian Himpel wrote:

On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Stephen Weinberg wrote:

...

go-lang-hg http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31913 This one is the best. It does not have any problems. It looks like it is mostly a copy of the one from abs except it fetches the tip instead of release. It also has provides/conflicts.

thanks, i'm the maintainer ;) this pkgbuild also supports the usage of godoc (by copying all .go source files in $GOROOT)

...

go-lang-hg has only one flaw, the name. I think it should be named go-hg since it is the hg of a package in community.

+1

cheers, chressie

Cool, if one of the TUs agrees with us, then you can re-upload it with the new name package. Also, you are right, I forgot to add works with godoc to the list of reasons. I just thought that was implied when I said it was a copy of the community pkgbuild. The reason why I want everything cleaned up is I plan to package some libraries and bindings. Then I want to make a set of standards for packaging them. -- Stephen

Now for go-hg and go-lang-hg: Christian ask the Maintainer if he will hand the package over to you, or at least improve it accordingly. I'll delete your package in a few days.

I was the maintainer of go-hg. This one was the basis for the package in community; I helped out Vegai some time ago. Anyway, I don't have access to that account anymore, nor the email that's associated with it. And I'm also not interested in maintaining it anymore. Feel free to disown all packages associated to account res, Andres P

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:

Am 08.06.2010 01:57, schrieb Andres P:

...

...

Now for go-hg and go-lang-hg: Christian ask the Maintainer if he will hand the package over to you, or at least improve it accordingly. I'll delete your package in a few days.

I was the maintainer of go-hg.

This one was the basis for the package in community; I helped out Vegai some time ago.

Anyway, I don't have access to that account anymore, nor the email that's associated with it. And I'm also not interested in maintaining it anymore.

Feel free to disown all packages associated to account res, Andres P

Done, thank you.

i adopted go-hg[1], flagged go-lang-hg[2] out of date and wrote a comment, that go-lang-hg was replaced by go-hg. so i think go-lang-hg[2] can be deleted now (it's too bad about the votes of [2]...). i hope that's okay now. cheers, chressie [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33695 [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31913

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Thorsten Töpper wrote:

On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:25:38 +0200 Christian Himpel wrote:

...

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:

...

Am 08.06.2010 01:57, schrieb Andres P:

...

...

Now for go-hg and go-lang-hg: Christian ask the Maintainer if he will hand the package over to you, or at least improve it accordingly. I'll delete your package in a few days.

I was the maintainer of go-hg.

This one was the basis for the package in community; I helped out Vegai some time ago.

Anyway, I don't have access to that account anymore, nor the email that's associated with it. And I'm also not interested in maintaining it anymore.

Feel free to disown all packages associated to account res, Andres P

Done, thank you.

i adopted go-hg[1], flagged go-lang-hg[2] out of date and wrote a comment, that go-lang-hg was replaced by go-hg. so i think go-lang-hg[2] can be deleted now (it's too bad about the votes of [2]...).

i hope that's okay now.

cheers, chressie

[1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33695 [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31913

Deleted go-lang-hg, people should have read the comment by now.

great, thanks! cheers, chressie