[aur-general] Deletion request: vimball
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27730 Maintainer: djszapi * vimball is included in the default vim distribution, so what's the point of packaging it? It's just duplicating the job that the vim maintainer is doing. * It is packaged very badly. It installs files to /usr/share/vim/{plugin,autoload,doc} instead of using usr/share/vim/vimfiles. Maybe the maintainer realised that it conflicted with the identical files already included in the vim distribution. Although these one's are in vim72... Andres P
Talked to the maintainer on IRC, reached a consensus to delete this. Done. On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Andres P <aepd87@gmail.com> wrote:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27730 Maintainer: djszapi
* vimball is included in the default vim distribution, so what's the point of packaging it? It's just duplicating the job that the vim maintainer is doing.
* It is packaged very badly. It installs files to /usr/share/vim/{plugin,autoload,doc} instead of using usr/share/vim/vimfiles. Maybe the maintainer realised that it conflicted with the identical files already included in the vim distribution. Although these one's are in vim72...
Andres P
participants (2)
-
Andres P
-
Jan Steffens