The following package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bluecurve-cursor-theme/
conflicts with this package in the official repos: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/xcursor-bluecurve/
But the AUR package provides extra variants on this cursor theme that the official repos package does not provide.
The AUR package in question is currently orphaned. I'm happy to adopt it, fix the pkgbuild and ensure that it only installs the variant themes and not the main theme that the official package provides. In this case it could be renamed to xcursor-bluecurve-extra or something like that? Or should the aur package simply be deleted?
What should happen here?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Charles Bos charlesbos1@gmail.com wrote:
The AUR package in question is currently orphaned. I'm happy to adopt it, fix the pkgbuild and ensure that it only installs the variant themes and not the main theme that the official package provides. In this case it could be renamed to xcursor-bluecurve-extra or something like that? Or should the aur package simply be deleted?
My take on this: Rename to xcursor-bluecurve-extra and have it conflicts=('xcursor-bluecurve'). There's a similar situation with the oxygen cursor theme.
J. Leclanche
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org