No problem. You definitely started first and went well beyond what I did. Thanks.
I'm curious -- do you know if I can capture and use the 50g ROM? If you know, could you send me a PM?
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 2:23 AM, René Herman rene.herman@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/28/2010 03:55 AM, Eric Waller wrote:
I was angling for that one :-P
I see. Had done this one already a month ago but was up to now still waiting for a possible maintainer-reply.
Note that I had crated a patch to the newer of the packages and it is
attached as a comment. How does your patch compare to mine?
It's fairly different. I saw the posted patch for x48-emulator just after I sent the message to the AUR mailing list but I believe that one only upped the version to 0.6.3 and added x86-64.
The old x48-emulator PKGBUILD (and the patched one, then) had a problem with missing dependencies and as described in the message, with a hard-coded "non-archlinux compliant" /usr/lib/X11/app-defaults directory.
I also install the ROMDump program from the sources for those of us that want to grab their own ROMs.
I sent an email to the maintainer (clamy) earlier this week and have heard
nothing back as yet.
Contacted him a month ago as well and also silence. Same for the original x48 maintainer.
I was going to adopt it, but if you would like it, that is okay by me.
For now, I've adopted it. I'll be fairly busy again with other things the coming period but was planning on at least looking into giving X48 a somewhat less obsolete configuration mechanism than the X defaults stuff (ie, just an /etc/x48.conf or some such). If you do more extensive "upstream work" than we can always switch maintainership of the package again. I'm normally at least fairly responsive to email...
New x48 is up on the AUR!
Regards, Rene
Hi! The package plymouth is out-of-date and don't work. Can you make this package in orphan statut?
Thank! Biginoz
On 03.09.2010 20:15, biginoz wrote:
Hi! The package plymouth is out-of-date and don't work. Can you make this package in orphan statut?
Thank! Biginoz
Done. It hasn't been updated in looong time.
Le 03/09/2010 20:39, Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit :
On 03.09.2010 20:15, biginoz wrote:
Hi! The package plymouth is out-of-date and don't work. Can you make this package in orphan statut?
Thank! Biginoz
Done. It hasn't been updated in looong time.
thks
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:05 PM, biginoz biginoz@free.fr wrote:
Le 03/09/2010 20:39, Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit :
On 03.09.2010 20:15, biginoz wrote:
Hi! The package plymouth is out-of-date and don't work. Can you make this package in orphan statut?
Thank! Biginoz
Done. It hasn't been updated in looong time.
thks
im curious, did you get /var/lib/plymouth/boot-duration to work ?
in my tests this file is never written and therefore no progress-bar in plymouth themes will ever be correct. as it reads the times of last boot from this file and sets the progress-bars accordingly...
Le 04/09/2010 11:39, Andre "Osku" Schmidt a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:05 PM, biginozbiginoz@free.fr wrote:
Le 03/09/2010 20:39, Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit :
On 03.09.2010 20:15, biginoz wrote:
Hi! The package plymouth is out-of-date and don't work. Can you make this package in orphan statut?
Thank! Biginoz
Done. It hasn't been updated in looong time.
thks
im curious, did you get /var/lib/plymouth/boot-duration to work ?
in my tests this file is never written and therefore no progress-bar in plymouth themes will ever be correct. as it reads the times of last boot from this file and sets the progress-bars accordingly...
I have a progress bar but I've bug, a warning message appear (glib) and break plymouth a few second before slim apparition.
Le 04/09/2010 11:39, Andre "Osku" Schmidt a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:05 PM, biginozbiginoz@free.fr wrote:
Le 03/09/2010 20:39, Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit :
On 03.09.2010 20:15, biginoz wrote:
Hi! The package plymouth is out-of-date and don't work. Can you make this package in orphan statut?
Thank! Biginoz
Done. It hasn't been updated in looong time.
thks
im curious, did you get /var/lib/plymouth/boot-duration to work ?
in my tests this file is never written and therefore no progress-bar in plymouth themes will ever be correct. as it reads the times of last boot from this file and sets the progress-bars accordingly...
Sorry i didn't understand your remark. I don't have this file too, and progress bar is not set correctly in duration times.
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org