-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 16:32, Reqamst wrote:

There are two packages refering to "Django Command Extensions"[1] in AUR: "django-extensions"[2] and "django-command-extensions"[3]. I think "django-command-extensions" is more accurate.

[1] http://code.google.com/p/django-command-extensions/ [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26813 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30353

I'm not so sure. For one, django-extensions is older and better known. For another, the site you linked talks about other extensions than Command ones (Database Model Field, Database Model, Admin). Are only the Command ones installed by the AUR packages? Thanks for bringing it to some attention whatever the choice, I/we hate dups :) -- Ranguvar [Devin Cofer] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJLK/XjAAoJEHdXKOHe3MUTrBYP+QFu8Jmt/Ef7EXr/nGTYCyc5 K4dkNg6IfBuhMuup59aXws3AP0XhUTvPQM4UG5eoc7VEo/myVXInhfepkMfhbSSo 1l/qD23xrX9YV69n88PEDjNvlOZjyKWMFtJTuD4fdR7/0z9saScsJE81MDKCy0yf bAXYf8kyUSdrDmr1GcX7RBQ1rJFWBW/1L+mfqiCP29pRHAouXHxpzxUl1e/9TVei 0dhuVtouWemaiFhLYMVycJc76mL3sRgsnerX2iEFZW9kXjbQo//504DheeCSqsrC ZK0RSj+cqoetpvc7RXfo/jwmsjoZgyb/r/qumBI/vsq0F0VQy0TJavDB7608Ptoh CgcfMpYCpjIsHiq2/vpDUrRQPkbIrJHBhqlVcPW9z/ePg1F/be4mcXIrhvxNTBS3 iGZ7SO3ywT2BioLTgy9TXbIhBAUabPNiH1dheq2LGQ9xyogulryrbVr25Jj1J76c eiN2EpFVfVbHZTHp+wz0Mqe5twbJgx0nAGliInedxSzTQRqBgj31OHbpw1D+YW4X 7pEY2IzCWxBacs+zWwHw+XYQuiU+lrLdRRz10WuQxB6PmS8nSFmJTXNe4CLW7pcK kFdZmQYYFjq6KFzSbJG4bv73wZ3WVKBwvS51YYBKUjAayO3m2ZzAxX3/QkzcyeWZ vUxuAEsOMxDYC3Pf07fn =nHym -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

If you check PKGBUILDs, you'll notice that they are exactly that same extensions - that same "url" und "source". Just django-extensions' PKGBUILD is better and more complex, but django-command-extensions' name is more accurate in compare to homesite. In that situations some kind of redirects would be useful - one pkgname could be just alias for second and users wouldn't have problems.

Yeah, I started to use today this package, and yeah it's duplicated in this format, and I agree with that django-command-extensions is better name for this package as you described it. I think it's worth to delete the other package and if someone would like to establish a more 'meta-package' then it will be uploaded. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp