[aur-general] Merge request (limbo and limbo_wine)
Greetings, I'm the maintainer of "limbo" [1] and the maintainer of "limbo_wine" [2] approached me and wants to merge our packages, which is fine by me. Can someone please merge both packages under the name "limbo" but using the tarball and having the maintainer of "limbo_wine"? Thanks, Can [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59673 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59799
"D. Can Celasun" <dcelasun@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
I'm the maintainer of "limbo" [1] and the maintainer of "limbo_wine" [2] approached me and wants to merge our packages, which is fine by me.
Can someone please merge both packages under the name "limbo" but using the tarball and having the maintainer of "limbo_wine"?
Thanks, Can
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59673 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59799
It doesn't work that way, the package name comes from the pkgbuild in the tarball. He needs to disown limbo for this to happen -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Daniel Wallace <danielwallace@gtmanfred.com
wrote:
"D. Can Celasun" <dcelasun@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
I'm the maintainer of "limbo" [1] and the maintainer of "limbo_wine" [2] approached me and wants to merge our packages, which is fine by me.
Can someone please merge both packages under the name "limbo" but using the tarball and having the maintainer of "limbo_wine"?
Thanks, Can
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59673 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59799
It doesn't work that way, the package name comes from the pkgbuild in the tarball. He needs to disown limbo for this to happen -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
I'm the owner of "limbo" and I have now disowned it. Does that work?
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:08:36PM +0200, D. Can Celasun wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Daniel Wallace <danielwallace@gtmanfred.com
wrote:
"D. Can Celasun" <dcelasun@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
I'm the maintainer of "limbo" [1] and the maintainer of "limbo_wine" [2] approached me and wants to merge our packages, which is fine by me.
Can someone please merge both packages under the name "limbo" but using the tarball and having the maintainer of "limbo_wine"?
Thanks, Can
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59673 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59799
It doesn't work that way, the package name comes from the pkgbuild in the tarball. He needs to disown limbo for this to happen -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
I'm the owner of "limbo" and I have now disowned it. Does that work? you want it to have the tarball from limbo? or limbo_wine? -- Daniel Wallace Archlinux Trusted User (gtmanfred) Georgia Institute of Technology
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Daniel Wallace <danielwallace@gtmanfred.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:08:36PM +0200, D. Can Celasun wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Daniel Wallace < danielwallace@gtmanfred.com
wrote:
"D. Can Celasun" <dcelasun@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
I'm the maintainer of "limbo" [1] and the maintainer of "limbo_wine" [2] approached me and wants to merge our packages, which is fine by me.
Can someone please merge both packages under the name "limbo" but using the tarball and having the maintainer of "limbo_wine"?
Thanks, Can
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59673 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59799
It doesn't work that way, the package name comes from the pkgbuild in the tarball. He needs to disown limbo for this to happen -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
I'm the owner of "limbo" and I have now disowned it. Does that work? you want it to have the tarball from limbo? or limbo_wine? -- Daniel Wallace Archlinux Trusted User (gtmanfred) Georgia Institute of Technology
The tarball from limbo_wine. The only thing that needs to be preserved from limbo is the comments.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:44 PM, D. Can Celasun <dcelasun@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Daniel Wallace <danielwallace@gtmanfred.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:08:36PM +0200, D. Can Celasun wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Daniel Wallace < danielwallace@gtmanfred.com
wrote:
"D. Can Celasun" <dcelasun@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
I'm the maintainer of "limbo" [1] and the maintainer of "limbo_wine" [2] approached me and wants to merge our packages, which is fine by me.
Can someone please merge both packages under the name "limbo" but using the tarball and having the maintainer of "limbo_wine"?
Thanks, Can
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59673 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59799
It doesn't work that way, the package name comes from the pkgbuild in the tarball. He needs to disown limbo for this to happen -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
I'm the owner of "limbo" and I have now disowned it. Does that work? you want it to have the tarball from limbo? or limbo_wine? -- Daniel Wallace Archlinux Trusted User (gtmanfred) Georgia Institute of Technology
The tarball from limbo_wine. The only thing that needs to be preserved from limbo is the comments.
Ah yes, it is right. I haven’t installed LIMBO on my Linux machine. By seeing nice packages on my HIB download page, I thought it is native. Well, it isn’t. Sorry. -- Kwpolska <http://kwpolska.tk> stop html mail | always bottom-post www.asciiribbon.org | www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html GPG KEY: 5EAAEA16
The limbo_wine PKGBUILD has been uploaded has been uploaded with the name limbo, so I believe it's fine to merge limbo_wine into limbo now.
Now you just need to have the limbo_wine maintainer (mirandir) change "pkgname=limbo_wine" to "pkgname=limbo" and reupload, and the TU's can merge limbo_wine into limbo afterwards.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Limao Luo <luolimao@gmail.com> wrote:
Now you just need to have the limbo_wine maintainer (mirandir) change "pkgname=limbo_wine" to "pkgname=limbo" and reupload, and the TU's can merge limbo_wine into limbo afterwards.
Allright, I've informed the maintainer.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:59 PM, D. Can Celasun <dcelasun@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings,
I'm the maintainer of "limbo" [1] and the maintainer of "limbo_wine" [2] approached me and wants to merge our packages, which is fine by me.
Can someone please merge both packages under the name "limbo" but using the tarball and having the maintainer of "limbo_wine"?
Thanks, Can
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59673 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59799
Please ignore this request. It is evil. It wants to destroy a package of the native version of LIMBO in favor of a non-native Wine one. This cannot be accepted. -- Kwpolska <http://kwpolska.tk> stop html mail | always bottom-post www.asciiribbon.org | www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html GPG KEY: 5EAAEA16
Sorry, but I don't really see the issue; if you actually examine the PKGBUILDS, the limbo_wine has essentially the same sources, but is a bit more comprehensive. Also, AFAIK, there is no native linux version, only Mac and Windows ones, as evidenced by the official site [3]. Therefore, the only way the game can run is by using Wine, as of now. [3] http://limbogame.org/store/
participants (4)
-
D. Can Celasun
-
Daniel Wallace
-
Kwpolska
-
Limao Luo