+1 — Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet

+1 to auto-mail + auto-orphan, I bet more packages will get picked up instead of sitting in limbo until somebody wants to deal with the process of getting a package orphaned. On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Thiago Barroso Perrotta < thiagoperrotta95@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 25 May 2014 17:06:21 +0200 Nowaker wrote:

...

What do you think about auto-orhpaning packages that stay marked out-of-date for more than, say, 3 months? Done automatically by AUR, with no request on ML.

+1 for that.

Of course, it would be nice to also auto-mail the maintainer, say, one week before the auto-orphaning.

...

Of course, it would be nice to also auto-mail the maintainer, say, one week before the auto-orphaning.

And to auto-mail to the list, perhaps somebody is willing to maintain a package.

I'm afraid there will be tons of such e-mails. Would be beter to have "Notify of orpaning" link in "Package Actions". Only interested people + the maintainer would get the notifications. -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Nowaker wrote:

...

...

Of course, it would be nice to also auto-mail the maintainer, say, one week before the auto-orphaning.

And to auto-mail to the list, perhaps somebody is willing to maintain a package.

I'm afraid there will be tons of such e-mails. Would be beter to have "Notify of orpaning" link in "Package Actions". Only interested people + the maintainer would get the notifications.

How about a daily digest email of orphaned packages, similar to the repository reports sent out for testing and community-testing? Regards, ~Celti