[aur-general] Unmerge mpv-build-git
Hi. Please unmerge mpv-build-git. This package use diferent repository . Mpv-git use "mpv" repository, my pakage use "mpv-build" repository See mpv-player in github Https://github.com/mpv-player
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:05 PM, SpinFlo <sl1pkn07@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi. Please unmerge mpv-build-git. This package use diferent repository . Mpv-git use "mpv" repository, my pakage use "mpv-build" repository
See mpv-player in github
Https://github.com/mpv-player
The PKGBUILD file is here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mp/mpv-build-git/PKGBUILD but I think the install file is gone.
la, 2013-09-07 kello 20:31 +0200, Karol Blazewicz kirjoitti:
The PKGBUILD file is here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mp/mpv-build-git/PKGBUILD but I think the install file is gone.
http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/tree/mpv-build-git everything is in there
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara <jesse.jaara@gmail.com>wrote:
la, 2013-09-07 kello 20:31 +0200, Karol Blazewicz kirjoitti:
The PKGBUILD file is here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mp/mpv-build-git/PKGBUILD but I think the install file is gone.
http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/tree/mpv-build-git everything is in there
Apologies for removing this one, I was too hasty and should have checked beforehand whether it was using another repo. -- Maxime
I'm glad mpv-build-git survived this somewhat obsessive elimination of 'extremely specialized' PKGBUILD's from the AUR. I wouldn't have any objection of merging mpv-player-git with mpv-build-git - they are both build via mpv-build.git recommended by the developers. But mpv-git uses a completely different build. BTW, merging a seemingly 'unused' package without votes and completely unrelated comments doesn't make sense either. On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara <jesse.jaara@gmail.com
wrote:
la, 2013-09-07 kello 20:31 +0200, Karol Blazewicz kirjoitti:
The PKGBUILD file is here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mp/mpv-build-git/PKGBUILD but I think the install file is gone.
http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/tree/mpv-build-git everything is in there
Apologies for removing this one, I was too hasty and should have checked beforehand whether it was using another repo.
-- Maxime
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Rob Til Freedmen <rob.til.freedman@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm glad mpv-build-git survived this somewhat obsessive elimination of 'extremely specialized' PKGBUILD's from the AUR.
I wouldn't have any objection of merging mpv-player-git with mpv-build-git - they are both build via mpv-build.git recommended by the developers.
But mpv-git uses a completely different build.
BTW, merging a seemingly 'unused' package without votes and completely unrelated comments doesn't make sense either.
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara < jesse.jaara@gmail.com
wrote:
la, 2013-09-07 kello 20:31 +0200, Karol Blazewicz kirjoitti:
The PKGBUILD file is here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mp/mpv-build-git/PKGBUILD but I think the install file is gone.
http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/tree/mpv-build-git everything is in there
Apologies for removing this one, I was too hasty and should have checked beforehand whether it was using another repo.
-- Maxime
For the record, mpv devs 'recommend' using these scripts because, and I quote, "distribution packages are often too old or too broken". Our packages are neither old nor broken, those script are absolutely not needed to build mpv on Arch, mpv in [community] and mpv-git in AUR are proofs of that. Even then, using git versions of ffmpeg, fribidi and libass and build mpv-git would have the exact same effect as building mpv-build-git. -- Maxime
Er. No. Mpv-player-git uses different repository than mpv-player-git. And the community mpv use dynamic library (ffmpeg and libass). mpv-build-git use exactly method to build this program. But uses latest updates from ffmpeg and others.. And uses the real method to get real version of the program (version.sh) El 09/09/2013 19:49, "Maxime Gauduin" <alucryd@gmail.com> escribió:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Rob Til Freedmen < rob.til.freedman@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm glad mpv-build-git survived this somewhat obsessive elimination of 'extremely specialized' PKGBUILD's from the AUR.
I wouldn't have any objection of merging mpv-player-git with mpv-build-git - they are both build via mpv-build.git recommended by the developers.
But mpv-git uses a completely different build.
BTW, merging a seemingly 'unused' package without votes and completely unrelated comments doesn't make sense either.
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara < jesse.jaara@gmail.com
wrote:
la, 2013-09-07 kello 20:31 +0200, Karol Blazewicz kirjoitti:
The PKGBUILD file is here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mp/mpv-build-git/PKGBUILD but I think the install file is gone.
http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/tree/mpv-build-git everything is in there
Apologies for removing this one, I was too hasty and should have checked beforehand whether it was using another repo.
-- Maxime
For the record, mpv devs 'recommend' using these scripts because, and I quote, "distribution packages are often too old or too broken". Our packages are neither old nor broken, those script are absolutely not needed to build mpv on Arch, mpv in [community] and mpv-git in AUR are proofs of that. Even then, using git versions of ffmpeg, fribidi and libass and build mpv-git would have the exact same effect as building mpv-build-git.
-- Maxime
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:57 PM, SpinFlo <sl1pkn07@gmail.com> wrote:
Er. No. Mpv-player-git uses different repository than mpv-player-git. And the community mpv use dynamic library (ffmpeg and libass). mpv-build-git use exactly method to build this program. But uses latest updates from ffmpeg and others.. And uses the real method to get real version of the program (version.sh) El 09/09/2013 19:49, "Maxime Gauduin" <alucryd@gmail.com> escribió:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Rob Til Freedmen < rob.til.freedman@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm glad mpv-build-git survived this somewhat obsessive elimination of 'extremely specialized' PKGBUILD's from the AUR.
I wouldn't have any objection of merging mpv-player-git with mpv-build-git - they are both build via mpv-build.git recommended by the developers.
But mpv-git uses a completely different build.
BTW, merging a seemingly 'unused' package without votes and completely unrelated comments doesn't make sense either.
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara < jesse.jaara@gmail.com
wrote:
la, 2013-09-07 kello 20:31 +0200, Karol Blazewicz kirjoitti:
The PKGBUILD file is here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mp/mpv-build-git/PKGBUILDbut I think the install file is gone.
http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/tree/mpv-build-git everything is in there
Apologies for removing this one, I was too hasty and should have checked beforehand whether it was using another repo.
-- Maxime
For the record, mpv devs 'recommend' using these scripts because, and I quote, "distribution packages are often too old or too broken". Our packages are neither old nor broken, those script are absolutely not needed to build mpv on Arch, mpv in [community] and mpv-git in AUR are proofs of that. Even then, using git versions of ffmpeg, fribidi and libass and build mpv-git would have the exact same effect as building mpv-build-git.
-- Maxime
It seems you didn't get my point, and I don't know what point you're trying to make. As I already pointed out, dynamically linking against git versions of said packages is the same as building against locally built versions of those git packages, except it is kinda stupid because you need to rebuild everything everytime you want to update mpv, not to mention saving space and CPU cycles, but those are your calls... As for the "real version", all it would take would be a comment on mpv-git asking the maintainer to use git describe (which is exactly what version.sh is doing) instead of what he's currently using. -- Maxime
┌─┤[sl1pkn07]|[sL1-BoOk]|[~/aplicaciones]| └───╼ git clone https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv.git Cloning into 'mpv'... remote: Counting objects: 201961, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (41576/41576), done. remote: Total 201961 (delta 158950), reused 199309 (delta 156496) Receiving objects: 100% (201961/201961), 47.42 MiB | 229.00 KiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (158950/158950), done. Checking connectivity... done ┌─┤[sl1pkn07]|[sL1-BoOk]|[~/aplicaciones]| └───╼ cd mpv/ ┌─┤[sl1pkn07]|[sL1-BoOk]|[~/aplicaciones/mpv]| └───╼ git describe --always libav_0.8.x-1339-g683e580 ┌─┤[sl1pkn07]|[sL1-BoOk]|[~/aplicaciones/mpv]| └───╼ └───╼ mpv --version mpv 0.1.0-193-g3992e5d (C) 2000-2013 mpv/MPlayer/mplayer2 projects built on Sun Sep 8 13:10:20 CEST 2013 2013/9/9 Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com>
As for the "real version", all it would take would be a comment on mpv-git asking the maintainer to use git describe (which is exactly what version.sh is doing) instead of what he's currently using.
-- Maxime
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Rob Til Freedmen <rob.til.freedman@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm glad mpv-build-git survived this somewhat obsessive elimination of 'extremely specialized' PKGBUILD's from the AUR.
I wouldn't have any objection of merging mpv-player-git with mpv-build-git - they are both build via mpv-build.git recommended by the developers.
But mpv-git uses a completely different build.
BTW, merging a seemingly 'unused' package without votes and completely unrelated comments doesn't make sense either.
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara < jesse.jaara@gmail.com
wrote:
la, 2013-09-07 kello 20:31 +0200, Karol Blazewicz kirjoitti:
The PKGBUILD file is here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mp/mpv-build-git/PKGBUILD but I think the install file is gone.
http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/tree/mpv-build-git everything is in there
Apologies for removing this one, I was too hasty and should have checked beforehand whether it was using another repo.
-- Maxime
For the record, mpv devs 'recommend' using these scripts because, and I quote, "distribution packages are often too old or too broken". Our
[packages] ... are point releases, eg. fribidi 0.19.5, libass 0.10.1 But mpv-build.git pulls in git repos from libass, fribidi and ffmpeg and links them as static libs to mpv for the very purpose git repos are in existence - to test development *before* changes are going to point releases.
packages are neither old nor broken, those script are absolutely not needed to build mpv on Arch, mpv in [community] and mpv-git in AUR are proofs of
I would expect a little bit more knowledge from you... development on either those packages goes hand.in.hand... but not always smooth ;)
that. Even then, using git versions of ffmpeg, fribidi and libass and build mpv-git would have the exact same effect as building mpv-build-git.
That's simply not true - it depends heavily on the changes made on the resp. repo.
-- Maxime
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Rob Til Freedmen < rob.til.freedman@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Rob Til Freedmen <
rob.til.freedman@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm glad mpv-build-git survived this somewhat obsessive elimination of 'extremely specialized' PKGBUILD's from the AUR.
I wouldn't have any objection of merging mpv-player-git with mpv-build-git - they are both build via mpv-build.git recommended by the developers.
But mpv-git uses a completely different build.
BTW, merging a seemingly 'unused' package without votes and completely unrelated comments doesn't make sense either.
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara < jesse.jaara@gmail.com
wrote:
la, 2013-09-07 kello 20:31 +0200, Karol Blazewicz kirjoitti:
The PKGBUILD file is here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mp/mpv-build-git/PKGBUILDbut I think the install file is gone.
http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/tree/mpv-build-git everything is in there
Apologies for removing this one, I was too hasty and should have checked beforehand whether it was using another repo.
-- Maxime
For the record, mpv devs 'recommend' using these scripts because, and I quote, "distribution packages are often too old or too broken". Our
[packages] ... are point releases, eg. fribidi 0.19.5, libass 0.10.1
But mpv-build.git pulls in git repos from libass, fribidi and ffmpeg and links them as static libs to mpv for the very purpose git repos are in existence - to test development *before* changes are going to point releases.
Those same git repos from which the git packages are built...... I sincerely hope you are doing this on purpose.
packages are neither old nor broken, those script are absolutely not needed to build mpv on Arch, mpv in [community] and mpv-git in AUR are proofs of
I would expect a little bit more knowledge from you... development on either those packages goes hand.in.hand... but not always smooth ;)
Your point? No, don't bother.
that. Even then, using git versions of ffmpeg, fribidi and libass and build mpv-git would have the exact same effect as building mpv-build-git.
That's simply not true - it depends heavily on the changes made on the resp. repo.
As does pulling the source code and linking statically, because again, same git repos, but whatever.
-- Maxime
I really feel like I'm wasting my time trying to reason with you. Your void arguments won't make you right, your toy package is gone and not needed, get over it. BTW, don't expect any more answers from me, I have got better things to do. So does everybody else on this mailing list. -- Maxime
Unused and unvote is for i reupload the pachake after delete/merge into other mpv package. El 09/09/2013 18:37, "Rob Til Freedmen" <rob.til.freedman@gmail.com> escribió:
I'm glad mpv-build-git survived this somewhat obsessive elimination of 'extremely specialized' PKGBUILD's from the AUR.
I wouldn't have any objection of merging mpv-player-git with mpv-build-git - they are both build via mpv-build.git recommended by the developers.
But mpv-git uses a completely different build.
BTW, merging a seemingly 'unused' package without votes and completely unrelated comments doesn't make sense either.
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara < jesse.jaara@gmail.com
wrote:
la, 2013-09-07 kello 20:31 +0200, Karol Blazewicz kirjoitti:
The PKGBUILD file is here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mp/mpv-build-git/PKGBUILD but I think the install file is gone.
http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/tree/mpv-build-git everything is in there
Apologies for removing this one, I was too hasty and should have checked beforehand whether it was using another repo.
-- Maxime
On 2013-09-07 20:05, SpinFlo wrote:
Hi. Please unmerge mpv-build-git. This package use diferent repository . Mpv-git use "mpv" repository, my pakage use "mpv-build" repository
See mpv-player in github
Https://github.com/mpv-player
Feel free to upload it again – AFAIK there is no unmerge functionality and 3 votes are not worth implementing it. Despite its crazy building method, it shouldn't be removed in the first place. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/
participants (6)
-
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
-
Jesse Juhani Jaara
-
Karol Blazewicz
-
Maxime Gauduin
-
Rob Til Freedmen
-
SpinFlo